"If it were an honest mistake, then he should be allowed to stay but pay a $50 fine. If on purpose, evicted."
Splendid idea. Perhaps the actor in question could, from the stage, be the prosecuting attorney. And the house manager could be the judge. The judge could ask the offender how he or she pleads, "on purpose, or not on purpose." If the offender replies, "Not on purpose, your honor," at that point, the prosecuting actor could lay out the case that the cellphone user rang his or her own phone "on purpose."
When both sides have presented their cases, the audience could decide by volume of applause whether the person "gets" to pay fifty dollars more for the show or has to leave the theater. Once the person pays the fine, which could go to Broadway Cares, the scene can be taken from the top.
It's a fabulous idea all around.
EXCEPT. If the person announces "FIFTY MORE bucks for this piece of crap? I'd rather gouge my eyes out," it could really hurt Saycon Sengbloh's feelings.
Twitter @NamoInExile
Instagram none