Just as I cannot read your mind (I can, however, deduce intention -- you make it awfully obvious), you can't tell how much energy I expend into my arguments. It's hardly extreme; I really don't work too hard.
ETA -- Speaking of which, DG just read my mind. Fabulous.
In all seriousness, I type over 100 WPM. Typing fast enough that a page takes a minute kind of throws the time/energy/length parallels. But point taken.
I have never said I don't post a lot, but I've also never tried to dismiss someone else's valid discussion and points against me by hypocritically claiming that it just wasn't worth all that talk - after incessantly posting about that very thing.
But, enough about you. And I mean that sincerely, ENOUGH about YOU.
Let's get this thread back to its original intention - the sharing and analysis of the lukewarm critical reception to CURTAINS.
You seem to have trouble getting back with the analysis program, Rath, let me help - it's like when you said that one critic could "bite me" (which I assume you said in a low energy fashion - and certainly nothing like a "savagely intense college student")
PS - my comments about my daily life are contained to the social threads, for which they are intended. And it's really not anyone's fault that the little we know of your 'life' is simply all there is to know.
Gosmile... you really made a valiant effort, for which I must applaud you, except that what you're trying to teach me is completely unncessary. In fact, it doesn't even make sense, since anyone can see in plain sight that I said in my post that I know it happens all the time -- that's the purpose of PR -- so you're not really teaching me a damned thing. I never said that it didn't happen to shows I like (not that I dislike Curtains), nor did I pass judgment on the ethics of said very common practice. I was making a correction about one particular instance, and gave no indication to whether I thought they should or should not be written verbatim. I said that it happens. I thank you for your effort, though, even if you've decided I did something that I um, did not. You must have worked really hard to invent that. To use words plucked from the post above, you and your smartass post are welcome to "bite me."
Honey, if you think my tone is rough and that my style is anywhere close to the bitchiest of what goes on here, you have a lot of looking around to do. And some skin to thicken! My posts here have hardly been that bad, so good luck with that, though you're perfectly welcome to return to the proverbial woodwork from whence you came. And get some practice in making up things that might even seem feasible. Tip for you: in the future, you may want to be sure that your fabrications of projective psychoanalysis can't be proven wrong before you spew them about.
Did anyone else notice how in their reviews, many critics said something like, "the only song which was really felt like Kander and Ebb's finest was...." and then they each named a different song. Ben Brantley said "Coffee Shop Nights," the guy from Time Out New York said "It's a Business," others said "a Tough Act to Follow" was the standout. Shows you how subjective one's opinions are. Updated On: 3/24/07 at 09:07 PM
Shows how good the music is too courtnyj. Nobody seems to be able to decide what songs are the most Kander and Ebb or which are standouts. I thought several songs were standouts. I need the CD. I can't get "It's a Business" out of my head.
Originally conceived by the Broadway pros Peter Stone, John Kander, and Fred Ebb (the book and additional lyrics are by Rupert Holmes), “Curtains” is ingeniously put together and smart about show business; with witty contributions from the set designer Anna Louizos and the costume designer William Ivey Long, it expertly spoofs everything to do with the clichés of the Broadway musical. At once a musical within a musical, a thriller, a backstage drama, and a romance, it is the narrative equivalent of a Dagwood sandwich, stuffed with relish and a lot of ham....