Curtains Reviews — Page 6

"it's not worth the extreme energy you give to arguments over it."

Which explains, of course, your multitude of posts on this show alone.

And no one has to read someone's mind who makes their intentions clear with the bitterly sarcastic quips left when they edit out their own posts.

DG - you're actually going to speak to someone else's "multitude of posts"?

Emcee, I apologize then - your posts are generally very lengthy, and to me, that feels like a lot of energy given. I believe you if you say it's not.

---

I type 94, so not really that much difference.

I'm just too busy either at work multitasking, at home multitasking, or too tired to give it the "all" that you do.

---

I never said it wasn't worth talk. I said it wasn't worth the intense energy some were giving it. Don't preach when you don't understand contect.

And honey, we know WAY more about your and your partner's daily life around here then we do mine.

Although I agree - let's get this thread back on track. I'm not going to respond to bait anymore.

---

Updated On: 3/25/07 at 07:45 PM

Gosmile... you really made a valiant effort, for which I must applaud you, except that what you're trying to teach me is completely unncessary. In fact, it doesn't even make sense, since anyone can see in plain sight that I said in my post that I know it happens all the time -- that's the purpose of PR -- so you're not really teaching me a damned thing. I never said that it didn't happen to shows I like (not that I dislike Curtains), nor did I pass judgment on the ethics of said very common practice. I was making a correction about one particular instance, and gave no indication to whether I thought they should or should not be written verbatim. I said that it happens. I thank you for your effort, though, even if you've decided I did something that I um, did not. You must have worked really hard to invent that. To use words plucked from the post above, you and your smartass post are welcome to "bite me."

(Typed in trademark "high energy mode.")

---

Updated On: 3/24/07 at 07:57 PM

Blah blah blah blah blah blah ...

Honey, if you think my tone is rough and that my style is anywhere close to the bitchiest of what goes on here, you have a lot of looking around to do. And some skin to thicken! My posts here have hardly been that bad, so good luck with that, though you're perfectly welcome to return to the proverbial woodwork from whence you came. And get some practice in making up things that might even seem feasible. Tip for you: in the future, you may want to be sure that your fabrications of projective psychoanalysis can't be proven wrong before you spew them about.

*tips hat*

Have a lovely night.

---

Updated On: 3/24/07 at 08:20 PM

Anyway....

Did anyone else notice how in their reviews, many critics said something like, "the only song which was really felt like Kander and Ebb's finest was...." and then they each named a different song. Ben Brantley said "Coffee Shop Nights," the guy from Time Out New York said "It's a Business," others said "a Tough Act to Follow" was the standout. Shows you how subjective one's opinions are.

Updated On: 3/24/07 at 09:07 PM

Not to change subjects.. but Jason Danielly looks awful. His face is skin and bones.

---

Noah Racey says: "Go back to talking about me!"


Ugh. Me too Lt. Cioffi. Actually I have a trio of songs that cycle through my head.

Updated On: 3/24/07 at 09:18 PM

Welcome back, Iris

And the show still sucked - and I ain't runnin' anywhere!

Is there a link to that?

---