gleek4114 said: "kristinj1 said: ""Why must every movie be made into a musical? This seems to be the new trend."
Seriously? Almost all successful musicals over time have been based on a pre-existing popular entertainment media... book, play, movie, etc. What real difference does it make what the original source of inspiration was, if the musical is good?
"
THIS. I hate when people complain about movies being adapted for the stage. Pre-existing material HAS always and WILL always be adapted for the stage, weather its a book, play, movie, TV show, video game, board game, etc. Movies seem to be the most popular at the moment, but that doesn't mean all are destined to be horrible and fail.
"
Well, here's the difference, since it seems to be eluding everyone here: In the old days musicals did what they could to DISTANCE themselves from the source material - but that's not what's happening today, is it? No. No, today is about branding because a bunch of movie people are trying to get B'way to be like the movie business. So, you get Legally Blonde, you get Honeymoon in Vegas, you get 9 to 5, you get every film title as BRAND and usually with "The Musical" tacked on. You didn't get Green Grow the Lilacs, The Musical, you didn't get Liliom, The Musical, you didn't get The Apartment, The Musical, you didn't get The Matchmaker, The Musical, you didn't get Ah, Wilderness, The Musical, you didn't get Anna and the King of Siam, The Musical - and that's what each and every one of the above would be called today. But the creators back then wanted their musicals to survive on their own, not be dragged along by some movie brand. They wanted to create something NEW and they did. That's not what they do today and if you don't know that, well, I don't know how to help you.