I mean, I think Evan obviously commits a pretty serious crime...
SPOILERS in order to continue this discussion
He commits fraud in the amount of $50,000 by soliciting money with false stories, and then to juice the donations when the money slows up, fraudulent documents that he helped create are used to re-invigorate the cause. Worse yet, the bulk of this fraudulently raised $50,000 is going to fix up an orchard that plays a central role in the lies he continued to perpetuate.
This is a serious crime with real legal ramifications. Anyone who contributed their $50 to the campaign should be able to sue and get their money back, IMO.
If I see an obituary in the Times of someone who died from cancer and come on here claiming he or she was my best friend and attempt to raise $50,000 to build a public peace garden in their name, I am committing fraud, even if it is for a "good cause" -peace gardens are lovely- but it is still fraud.
I wouldnt necessarily classify Asperger's or autism as a mental illness, but if I were a juror and I knew a defendant was somewhere on the spectrum would most likely affect my judgement/empathy towards the situation. A mental impairment, for lack of a better word, can physically impact your judgement. Simply being shy and awkward does not.
Marie: Don't be in such a hurry about that pretty little chippy in Frisco.
Tony: Eh, she's a no chip!
Updated On: 11/18/16 at 02:19 PM