Broadway Legend Joined: 2/10/11
I am flabbergasted that the Washington Post gave this show a rave. Even liked the tacky sets. Does anyone know whether he is one of those critics who likes everything. Since it is the Post, I would assume not, just wondering.
BroadwayNYC2 said: "I saw this last week and found it…rough. The direction is incredibly weak and the set is straight up ugly. Roses everywhere? Giant flags that come down as she sings A New Argentina and Rainbow tour? This is not an Evita that should go to Broadway."
Christine Swartzman is crazy if she decides to bring this cast - production to Broadway because it will flop!
“I am flabbergasted that the Washington Post gave this show a rave.”
Peter Marks is…embarrassing to say the least. One of the worst reviewers In an industry that means less and less by the day.
Broadway Legend Joined: 2/10/11
Robbie2 said: "BroadwayNYC2 said: "I saw this last week and found it…rough. The direction is incredibly weak and the set is straight up ugly. Roses everywhere? Giant flags that come down as she sings A New Argentina and Rainbow tour? This is not an Evita that should go to Broadway."
Christine Swartzman is crazy if she decides to bring this cast - production to Broadway because it will flop!"
And even worse, it would be the second flop out of only two revivals, which would hamper future revivals, which would be a terrible shame.
BroadwayNYC2 said: "“I am flabbergasted that the Washington Post gave this show a rave.”
Peter Marks is…embarrassing to say the least. One of the worst reviewers In an industry that means less and less by the day."
I read that review and audibly said "Did someone pay him off?" because I've never disagreed with a review that much
Agree. Marks' review is baffling. This EVITA is a mess & miss.
Jason Sherwood posted something on closing saying goodbye...for now. Does this mean it's coming to new york?
Videos