Posted: 12/15/24 at 9:00am
I could be reading too much into this and it's simply due to other factors such as the schedule of creative team/cast etc. but I have been surprised recently at some show openings that don't confirm to the conventional wisdom of opening in the spring....for example Kimberly Akimbo, Swept Away, Maybe Happy Ending etc. are all shows that I would never have expected to open when they did. And now the rumour also looking that next to normal revival looking at opening at a similar time?
Is it possible due to lack of theatre availability and in an effort to secure their place, producers with risky shows are now somewhat forced to consider opening earlier in the year? From a theatre owner perspective, if there is a long line of potential tenants (my understanding is that this is one of the key issues with Broadway producing) for spring they can pick and choose. However, if they can find a show to open in an undesirable time they'd probably sign them up rather than leave the theatre empty and then how it progresses is a win/win for the theatre owner - let them continue making money well into the spring/summer if things turn out well or if they fail they get a new tenant anyway.
If these risky shows would prefer to wait until the Spring, the theatre owner might choose a less risky choice waiting in line. Of course, this also creates an unfortunate vicious cycle where risky shows are even less likely to succeed than they did.
Is this a crazy conspiracy or could this be happening?
Updated On: 12/15/24 at 09:00 AM