Ravenclaw said: "Well, for an artist who loves to extoll the virtues of collaboration so much, pulling the "You work for me!" card is kind of aggressive. Even if it is factual, it's not a very respectful or productive way to win an argument. And it should be noted thatat least in America, the contracts generally give the playwright final say on their material and provide them the right to revoke the rights to their work. So, when the show was at ART, Diane Paulus's position as Artistic Director technically means she was everybody's boss, if you want to speak purely hierarchically, Griffin Matthews's rights as author protect his text from decisions he doesn't sign off on. And if these words were spoken during the run at Second Stage, Paulus was not Matthews's boss."
I agree it was a crappy remark, if said as quoted. Matthews also mentions that he was threatened with the withdrawal of the show entirely if he didn't agree to changes in casting and text and I don't know what all.
It's like the famous story about Ethel Merman refusing to learn a new intro two weeks before opening night ("Call me Miss Bird's Eye, the show's frozen!"
: yes, the Guild will back the authors' control of their material, but nobody can force the producer to go forward with a project s/he decides isn't working. Nobody can force a star of Merman's wattage to go on stage if she declines. Oh, sure, the writers could sue her, but in the process they'd lose several years' work and perhaps all their earnings to the lawyers.
A relatively young playwright--however talented--in a disagreement with a well-established artistic director isn't likely to come out ahead, regardless of the color of anyone involved. But Mr. Matthews is obviously smart and articulate; perhaps he has good reason to think the friction was race-based.