wonderfulwizard11 said: "This isn't like the Tonys where everything nominated gets to perform- were that the case, the show would be about five days long.
I think Fun Home is a stunning artistic achievement, but it would have been so out of place to have a performance from the show at the Grammys. Hamilton is a phenomenon, but it sounds like most contemporary music today and that is what the Grammys are generally honoring. Fun Home, as great as it is, sounds very little like what's being heard in the mainstream music world
"
I didn't say I realistically expected it - time wise - but it would have still been nice. But I think you explain it best and accurately... but in a sense explains what very wrong to me. They were willing to showcase Hamilton partly because it's innovative but partly because it's what contemporary music sounds like today....so if it's different and innovative to what is commonly being heard, it doesn't get the time? To me, that's a problem. So the Grammy's reward something new and different - as long as it's not too different?
Don't mind me..just thinking out loud.