"I hate how catty people get on this board for no reason.
WAT likes the shows he likes, period.
You like the shows you like, period."
WiCKED, saying something like this implies that we're all just getting catty because we disagree, and ignores the fact that one person in particular is making nasty, definitive proclamations, calling people who disagree with them "wrong" and talking of despising people because of a review they wrote. No one (except that person) is getting catty simply because someone else feels differently than them.
Just because you happen to agree with that person and the supporters of the show, I'd still think you would be able to see/understand the differences between his attitude and everyone else's (btw, referring to WAT as 'WAT' and me/kingkong/whoever as 'You' kind of makes it clear who you're specifically bitching about, not just 'people' in general).
"Scott Thomas also got across the board rave reviews in a show that was also a financial success. She gave the performance of her career in THE SEAGULL."
Okay, this is getting ridiculous. I know you like making definitive, "pull-quote" type broad-sweeping proclamations, but I am sincerely wondering how many different performances of Scott Thomas you've ACTUALLY seen, to be able to make the statement "the performance of her career". Which of her other great performances have you seen: The English Patient? I've Loved You So Long? Tell No One? Four Weddings and a Funeral? Gosford Park? Bitter Moon? Angels and Insects? How many have you even heard of?
I'm not going to say "The Seagull" simply ISN'T her best performance (though she's great, I personally don't think it's her absolute best), but I will say, sometimes just using an adjective will do. You don't always need to say something is the MOST ______ or BEST _______ or ONE OF THE MOST ________. Hyperbole gets really old, especially when you're declaring something the BEST of a career largely made up of performances/films you haven't seen.
Updated On: 3/30/09 at 03:11 AM