Any thoughts?
My opinion...call me crazy but
If Legally Blonde would have played the Hirschfield it would have lasted longer.
oh GOD.
please... no.
Legally Blonde was destined to fail (and close)
Broadway Legend Joined: 5/3/06
If Title of Show would have played the Booth it would have lasted longer.
God, ucjrdude, learm to communicate in proper English.
"If _____ HAD played the _____ it would have..."
Obviously the product of a public school.
I agree about LEGALLY BLONDE.
But disagree about [title of show].
If LaChiusa's THE WILD PARTY had played the O'Neill or the Kerr, it would have lasted longer.
Legally Blonde passed on the Hirschfeld. They did have a chance to book it but took the larger Palace instead.
If XANADU had played the smallest house on Broadway, maybe it would have lasted longer and recouped...oops!! Guess it did play the smallest house on Broadway and didn't recoup a dime. It deserved that fate.
Broadway Legend Joined: 9/25/08
XANADU played a nice run.
Anyway, if '13' played the Helen Hayes.
If The Story of My Life had played Off-Broadway it would probably still be here.
If it HAD, not if it "would have."
Broadway Legend Joined: 5/29/07
If Tale of Two Cities had played the Hilton, it would have run longer, and here's why:
The show originally had large, grand design plans, which made it a truly epic piece of musical theatre. Making all of those designs as minimal as possible, in my opinion, was like telling the creators their show wasn't important enough. If they felt important about themselves, made their best effort to fix their mistakes, who knows, it may have infact run longer. Also, getting bigger names and more advertising would have helped tremendously.
Broadway Legend Joined: 2/22/08
If TITLE OF SHOW would have played the Helen Hayes theatre it would have lasted longer
Broadway Legend Joined: 5/20/03
If Sunset Boulevard had played the Mark Hellinger, Patti LuPone would still be bitter, but the theater's interior would have made a more interesting setting for the show.
If "The Fantasticks" had played the Gershwin.
Oh wait...
LOL!!!!!!!
Chorus Member Joined: 11/25/08
MisterRussell, what the hell does "Obviously the product of a public school." mean? If someone makes a grammatical error, it is unfair and just plain stupid to blame the public school system. You're an idiot and your comment is stupid.
Xanadu may have played a "nice run" and thrilled many audience members but the point here is that it didn't make a profit and never really could have in that space.
If "Taboo" would have played Studio 54 it would have lasted longer. They could have retained the giant mirror ball "Cabaret" used and during the nightclub and finale turned 54 into a real Taboo.
Featured Actor Joined: 8/21/08
OK I can't stand it anymore:
Xanadu, as conceived (before it was mounted) -- IT WAS condemned...Deader-Than-A-Doornail failure stupid are you crazy fugettaboutit.
Then it runs, well, about 18 months longer than anyone predicted, or something (I'm estimating).
TELL ME please I gotta KNOW: What was costing so much that it was not possible to recoup? (this is my question)
And can't the tour(s) add to the hit/flop equation if it/they are produced by the same Prod. Co.?
Which in the strictest sense, could turn the flop into a hit [according to the financial calculus]?
[wuh?]
If TALE OF TWO CITIES had played the Hilton, it would've run about 3 weeks rather than...what, 7? I don't care how "epic" or "sprawling" the design was to be, the content simply couldn't hack it. And, on that note, let's segue to:
If YOUNG FRANKENSTEIN had played the St. James, it most likely would still be here today. I happened to be one of the many who enjoyed the show, and I feel that the greed displayed through the ticket prices and theatre move only hampered the show's afterlife. If Brooks stuck with his original house and proceeded with caution about premium seats, the monster would still be playing.
And, I don't care if [TOS] played in someone's basement, it had no business moving to Broadway; it would've closed after a few months, anyway.
Understudy Joined: 5/22/07
If [title of show] had played the Circle in the Square, it would have lasted longer.
"If [tos] had stayed off-Broadway, it would still be around. *sigh*"
It was far from full when I saw it at the Vineyard, so I don't know if that's true.
"Xanadu may have played a 'nice run' and thrilled many audience members but the point here is that it didn't make a profit and never really could have in that space."
I'm not sure if you're saying that Xanadu might have returned more of its investment if it had played in a larger house.
If so, I'd mention in reply that it didn't play one week at capacity in the Hayes. If it couldn't sell out that theatre, how would it have returned more of its investment in a larger house? It only played at 90% or above for six weeks at different points during the run. The only thing a larger theatre would have meant is more unsold seats.
>What was costing so much that it was not possible to recoup? (this is my question)<
Every show has a running cost - the salaries for everyone working on it, from cast, orchestra, crew, general management, press, advertising, marketing, theatre rental, theatre staff, plus costs for print, radio, tv, internet and outdoor advertising. The general problem with Xanadu is that while the Helen Hayes was physically a good choice for the show, the amount they could bring in with the theatre's limited seating capacity was not enough to meet expenses and generate a substantial enough profit. In other words, too high a running cost in too small a theatre - a sisyphusian predicament from the start. Had the show been a bigger full price ticket seller, it might have been able to meet costs, but it lived mostly on discounts.
spiritx33 ~ That was my thinking all along. I may not have been a huge fan of the show, but it seems like that theater AND location would have been much better ~ size-wise and walk-by publicity-wise. They could have done their lotto right after Wicked's a la Spelling Bee and garnered some of that crowd.
Would it still be running? Who knows. Maybe, maybe not. But I think it would have lasted longer there.
If almost ANY show would have played the Circle in the Square it would have lasted longer than it did at any other theater. Ditto to the Helen Hayes. They're very small theaters.
I agree about YOUNG FRANKENSTEIN in any other theater to be quite honest...it didn't need to be as big and over-the-top as it was and it could have been a big hit in a smaller theater.
Videos