Broadway Legend Joined: 6/5/09
"you're invited by someone who wrote the show--you could at least focus on a few things you did like."
Yeah, like that would have cut it.
You lie, you bow, you scrape.
Politeness demands grace and gratitude, but more than mere politeness is required here.
"If something isn't working, they already know that."
I don't think that's necessarily always true.
Nevertheless, soft sell is usually a better approach when talking to people involved with a project that's not working. Most artists generally really don't want to hear anything other than praise, and would rather shield themselves from reproach than hear anything negative that others might actually think (whether the opinions of those others are insightful or idiotic).
Brown says that he was there on the "very same night that the Times came to review the show," so the show was frozen and it was too late to give constructive feedback.
I think there is a distinction between giving feedback at a point it could be helpful and giving feedback at a point when it's too late. It may be worthwhile to give feedback on a novel when it's in the rough draft phase, but there's not as much of a point in giving that feedback once it's been published. Or pointing out problems with a potential wedding reception venue vs pointing out those same problems after the reception is over.
Broadway Legend Joined: 7/18/11
I have always lived by Sondheim's rule. There are only 3 people in the business who want to hear the truth and I've never met any of them. My response is always "I loved it!" Now, if you ask 3 times what I *really* thought, and you put your hand on my shoulder the third time, then I'l share. But that rarely happens.
bk said:"Why is this "blog" entry new news? This same thing appeared in The Sondheim Review, what, a year ago? "
Exactly, as I said, it appeared even before that. But JRB has editorialized it each time, so...
People on this board might be surprised at what I said to Tracie Bennetts when I met her after that disgusting and despicable show.
I considered it the only honorable thing to say.
Broadway Legend Joined: 9/16/07
"I'm sorry about that hermajesty person"?
A8 said: "Yeah, like that would have cut it.
You lie, you bow, you scrape.
Politeness demands grace and gratitude, but more than mere politeness is required here."
Since you were replying to me, how would you have gone about it? I don't obviously know you, but I know that you do care about personal manners, politeness and kindness. Would you have just said "it stinks", ordered the lobster and champagne and left?
"Brown says that he was there on the "very same night that the Times came to review the show," so the show was frozen and it was too late to give constructive feedback. "
This is what irks me about Brown. He now says it was NOT Passion--and yet he also says it was a new Sondheim show and was in 1993... None of the changes to his story add up, whatsoever. If he wants to keep telling the story, and changing it, why doesn't he just go full throttle and tell all the details?
I said "You were magnificent."
"Ugh. JRB's "lesson" portion of the post is now going around my Facebook News Feed as an real quote attributed to Stephen Sondheim."
Sigh, mine too...
"It wasn’t “Passion”!
Comment by Jason Robert Brown on November 1, 2012 at 8:48 pm
EDIT: Frank Rich's Times review of PUTTING IT TOGETHER appeared April 2, 1993."
Oh! *slaps head* For some reason that seems even more odd. It was not a great show by any means, but I wouldn't call it a new show. And why wouldn't JRB say "We were treated to a new version of an old revue of his songs!" (Probably because that would negate the point he was trying to make...)
And it's a show that Sondheim had to be persuaded to give his blessing to by Cameron Mackintosh.
I don't know. The story as a whole just sounds suspect- especially considering its details have altered at each telling, apparently.
Broadway Legend Joined: 9/16/07
If it was Putting It Together, the story becomes a bit melodramatic.
If it was Putting it Together, the story becomes hilarious.
Exactly. I get the feeling JRB wanted to get a reaction, and in this small community--he has. Why else title it the way he has? Why not title his blog post "A valuable lesson I learned..." or something.
I sorta kinda think it was Merrily, and he was fudging the year to protect the identity of the other composer.
Broadway Legend Joined: 9/16/07
But then he would have been 11.
There was also a revival in '93.
Broadway Legend Joined: 9/16/07
1994, but I don't think Frank Rich reviewed it.
He didn't.
David Richards did.
Maybe Sondheim sprung for a free airline ticket to get them out to see Merrily in London, too? Since he's just givin' stuff away to strangers.
Broadway Legend Joined: 9/16/07
Also, who would go to an off-Broadway revival of Merrily expecting Sweeney Todd?
Well, if they went into Putting It Together expecting Sweeney Todd, they would've at least gotten a little of it.
...and how is it a new show... Increasingly I wonder if JRB thinks his readers just won't care about things like, well, dates?
So who do we think "Franz Liszt" is? The composer Brown describes as "understandably reluctant" to "demonstrate and recount" his own stupidity:
Franz is not as sheepish as I. He’s a little older, but he’s also devastatingly charming, impossibly talented, and confident that he can guide any conversation safely to shore. I occasionally refer to him as “The Waring Blender” because he is so smooth.
Videos