why must we focus on the professionalism and work ethic of daniel davis, and not at all on the excellent work of Hillner, the understudy? whether or not he was as good as davis or had any kind of chemistry with beach, the fact remains that the man had NEVER REHEARSED THE ROLE and was able to pull it off when called upon.
focus on the fact that anything can happen in live theatre and this whole incident is a great story, what with fierstein killing time while hillner learned the dances and the stagehands with scripts waiting in the wings after each scene so he could "load up" on info before going on again.
you might love the show or hate it, and you may or may not see this as a bad reflection on Davis. but either way, it's a great theatre story, and anyone here who has been involved in theatre should be able to appreciate it. I don't think anyone's posted the link in this thread, so here it is:
http://www.broadway.com/Gen/Buzz_Story.aspx?ci=503034
if you haven't read it, please do. as for davis, I'm fully confident that he can be trusted to make his own decisions as to whether he's healthy enough to give a proper performance. that had to be an embarrassing, difficult thing to do and he had to know it would wind up on the big theatre news sites. I seriously doubt he's going to be pulling a Donna Murphy on us.
"The last train out of any station will not be full of nice guys."
- Dr. Hunter S. Thompson
"I wash my face, then drink beer, then I weep.
Say a prayer and induce insincere self-abuse,
till I'm fast asleep"- In Trousers