hearthemsing22 said: "kdogg36 said: "hearthemsing22 said: "Once again, 72 shows is not a significant part of her contract."
I entirely agree with you that we shouldn't be prying into an actor's personal business, especially since we already know enough about her personal business to understand why she might have missed a bunch ofperformances. If there's any legitimate gripe, it's strictly abouthow the production handled her absences, assuming some of them were predictable.
However, 72 shows is nine weeks' worth of performances, and obviously that's a significant part of her contract.
"
We also have to realize we don't know what's in her contract, and how many of those absences were planned. And how many the production is allowing. Why can't we give a pregnant actress a break?? Yes, I have been reminded plenty of times that people see the show because of the leading trio, but at the same time, we have to understand the immense pressure she's putting on herself. I'm seeing the show in a few weeks. Would I be disappointed if I don't see her? Personally, no. I would not. But that's just me."
She's above the title, and she's missed almost 25% of performances, with 0 announced by the production in advance of people arriving at the theatre to find out she's not there, which started last fall, way before she was pregnant. If that doesn't matter to you, fine, but why do you continue to lecture others that do care, and have every right to be upset or annoyed? It doesn't make you a better person than they are, so please stop acting like it does.
Updated On: 6/13/24 at 12:57 PM