henrikegerman said: "I agree, of course, that a performance for the stage may not work on film, and the converse. However, it shouldn't be forgotten - and I'm not suggesting that anyone here is forgetting - that Staunton's taped Rose was a performance given on stage and for a stage audience. Which arguably raises the question, do and should actors recalibrate performances given live before audiences on those occasions when they are being taped. I don't pretend to have an answer to this one; but it's worth discussing."
That is a very interesting question and one those dynamics theater vs. film playing it to the back of the audience as opposed to a camera should all be taken into consideration when filming a live theater performance.
A friend of mine has always wanted a professionally filmed version of the Original Broadway production of "Evita" as he was not around to see it when it was around and I told him that unless Patti LuPone toned it down for a filmed/taped version it would truly be, at least to me, unwatchable. That performance as it was on the stage with all it's brilliance, determination and downright ferocity would not go over very well with the intimacy of the camera. She would have had to dial it down a couple of hundred notches.
EDIT: That's not to say that it cannot be done. Look at the wonderful filmed/taped performances that were done of "Sweeney Todd" and "Into the Woods" - to name just two.
You Can Disagree Without Being Disagreeable
Updated On: 7/11/16 at 02:59 PM