This is what I posted in the other Evita thread (and sorry folks, but this is just how I feel):
"I found her performance in Evita cold, remote, plastic, unemotive (partly the director's fault as well) and undersung. It was like her video for "Vogue" -- lots of posing and attitude, but without a drop of warm blood running underneath the facade. Where was the fire? The spontaneity? The life behind the eyes? The whole film looked like a two hour feminine hygiene commercial to me. Nice cinematography. No depth whatsoever. Whatever criticisms one may have of Lupone, she never lacked in urgency and fire and passion (to say nothing of VOICE)."
I would also add that Parker further distanced Eva during the crowd scenes (notably "Don't Cry For Me Argentina") by filming Madonna singing to the crowd and then cutting to the crowd staring up at Madonna, leaving us in the audience in the odd position of being a third party observer not only of Eva, but also of the crowd itself. By never having Madonna sing directly to us (an odd choice since Che and other charcters do sing directly into the camera), Parker cuts us off from the full emotional impact of that and other scenes, making Eva a remote figure to us and thus she is never fully able to engage our (or at least MY) sympathies.
Beyond her vocal shortcomings, Madonna's performance to me is all posture and artifice, but part of that is the fault of her director whose camera and editing choices, rendered her even more one-dimensional than her hollow performance deserved. Forget Lupone for a moment, imagine the richness and charisma and nuance and inner life a Streep or even a Pfeiffer could have brought to the role, even with a less-than-competent Parker at the healm.
"What a story........ everything but the bloodhounds snappin' at her rear end." -- Birdie
[http://margochanning.broadwayworld.com/]
"The Devil Be Hittin' Me" -- Whitney