"Except that all of those things that you say she needs to work on are what got her critical acclaim for that part. She fits the part perfectly. Roxie, as a character, not as an actress, isn't a performer. That's the whole concept of the show. So while you say she needs to work on her singing and dancing, the critics said things like :
"A sensational Roxie, possibly the most convincing I have seen." -Brantley
or
"The contours of the character fit Griffith's screen persona like a lace glove: Inside this Roxie, a knowing woman playing the little girl lost, is a real little girl lost.' -Isherwood"
I agree with what you say because Roxie Hart is supposed to be a not so-talented actress/singer. I think she did ok in Chicago, but her singing and dancing was sooo awful that it was like watching a trainwreck at times.
Anyways, I somehow agree with what you say and on top of that she sold out her entire run basically. We can agree that her Broadway engagement was a success(the movie won the Oscar a few months before she took the role of Roxie, so that also must have helped)
Anyways, I did see Brooke Shields as Roxie and she was very good. Also if you base your opinion on reviews you should look for the ones of Brooke in Wonderful Town. She was even better as Ruth Sherwood.
"People have their opinions and that doesn't mean that their opinions are wrong or right. I just take it with a grain of salt because opinions are like as*holes, everyone has one".
-Felicia Finley-
Updated On: 8/31/09 at 09:14 PM