I am talking about the theatrical aspects and the sets and cinematography. Not about the particular story line or music style.
"How the hell could you possibly do a dramatic musical like that?"
Well, for example there are more emotions than crying (which unfortunately are the only scenes that work in that sobbing-speaking-crying style of Les Mis that gave me migraine.) For example, there are many moments in Miss Saigon where Kim does not cry, for example when she dreams of something and is very happy, and sings about it, what matters is all the details and nuances in her soaring notes that evoke the right emotion (the whole basis of telling a story through song, nuances, beginnings, mids and endings of each note, building up, go softer/louder etc, etc), a very delicate artform, and those feelings can be complimented by all the wonderful things cinematography has to offer. So for example, the "Roxy" scene in Chicago, which is basically playing in the character's mind, or the "Your song" scene in Moulin Rouge, which is also a bit surreal, it doesn't always have to be an empty conrete room just because the filmmakers think that only then the audience will feel real emotion. Filmmaking is about other things.
Better than life things. Filming "Last night of the world" in an empty conrete room in 1 take and pretend that only then the result will feel "real" for the audience is the dumbest thing you can do in a musical film, and insulting to this artform too. Especially when it's done by people who do not master the craft of real singing. Then all we will see and feel is 2 people in an empty concrete room struggling with singing. Basically, like all the scenes in les mis aside from the crying scenes. At least proper cinematography would have made up for the bad singing (a little). The result for the audience lies in other things.
Updated On: 3/15/15 at 03:43 PM