Musicals that were heavily revised for their revival?

[ljay889]

Musicals that were heavily revised for their revival?#1

Posted: 7/11/08 at 1:01am

I'm curious how many musicals were heavily revised for their revival.

Revisions I'm counting
- book changes
- new songs/cut songs
- new orchestrations

I can think of

No, No, Nanette (1971)
Follies (1987) London
Anything Goes (1987)
Damn Yankees (1994)
Cabaret (1998 )
Kiss Me Kate (1999)
Annie Get Your Gun (1999)
Sweet Charity (2005)
The Threepenny Opera (2006) a new translation
The Pajama Game (2006) would this count???
Pal Joey (2008 ) *Upcoming revival
Brigadoon (2008-2009?) *Upcoming revival

I am glad Encores! present shows in their original format. Most of these shows don't need all these revisions.

What others?





Updated On: 7/11/08 at 01:01 AM

[LizzieCurry]

re: Musicals that were heavily revised for their revival?#2

Posted: 7/11/08 at 1:03am

Flower Drum Song

"This thread reads like a series of White House memos." — Mister Matt

[TheatreFreak05]

re: Musicals that were heavily revised for their revival?#2

Posted: 7/11/08 at 1:10am

Anything Goes has gone through several changes. Many songs have been added and subtracted and the plot has changed drastically in its different revivals.

[CATSNYrevival]

re: Musicals that were heavily revised for their revival?#3

Posted: 7/11/08 at 1:12am

The only other one I can think of that underwent major changes was Grease for both the 1994 revival and the current revival.

[ljay889]

re: Musicals that were heavily revised for their revival?#4

Posted: 7/11/08 at 1:12am

Haha. I just added ANYTHING GOES as you posted that.

[CATSNYrevival]

re: Musicals that were heavily revised for their revival?#5

Posted: 7/11/08 at 1:14am

Oh, and Peter Pan.

[BroadwayEnthusiast2]

re: Musicals that were heavily revised for their revival?#6

Posted: 7/11/08 at 1:25am

Les Miz.

"I mean, sitting side by side with another man watching Patti LuPone play Rose in GYPSY on Broadway is essentially the equivalent of having hardcore sex." -Wanna Be A Foster. "Say 'Goody.' Say 'Bubbi.'" ... "That's it. Exactly as if it were 'Goody.' Now I know you're gonna sing 'Goody' this time, but nevertheless..."

[wicked91]

re: Musicals that were heavily revised for their revival?#7

Posted: 7/11/08 at 2:05am

I totally agree with PETER PAN. I have both the Mary Martin and Cathy Rigby versions, and man they are different!

[TheatreFreak05]

re: Musicals that were heavily revised for their revival?#8

Posted: 7/11/08 at 2:07am

What did they change in Les Miz? I thought it wasn't really a "Revival", and they just brought it back to Broadway in its original form?

[GlindatheGood22]

re: Musicals that were heavily revised for their revival?#9

Posted: 7/11/08 at 2:15am

From what I've heard, Side Show is very different this time around, which I'm not so happy about. I really hope they didn't cut We Share Everything...

I know you. I know you. I know you.

[strelimyn]

re: Musicals that were heavily revised for their revival?#10

Posted: 7/11/08 at 3:03am

How about the 1997 Revival of Once Upon a Mattress? Along with the revised and broadened Spanish Panic, there were other changes of the book and song lyrics.

sumladfrompa.tumblr.com

[Eastwickian]

re: Musicals that were heavily revised for their revival?#11

Posted: 7/11/08 at 3:45am

It seems that nearly every time Candide gets revived it has a new book and includes different songs.

[CATSNYrevival]

re: Musicals that were heavily revised for their revival?#12

Posted: 7/11/08 at 4:07am

I thought of a few more. Both Company and Follies ended up having completely revised books for their revivals, Into the Woods incorperated a few book and lyric revisions and The Scarlet Pimpernel underwent some major book revisions, song cuts and song additions by the time it reopened at the Neil Simon Theatre. though I don't believe Pimpernel was considered a revival at the time. Or was it?
Updated On: 7/11/08 at 04:07 AM

[ray-andallthatjazz86]

re: Musicals that were heavily revised for their revival?#13

Posted: 7/11/08 at 4:20am

CANDIDE definitely comes to mind, as well as CABARET, ANYTHING GOES, and the Garber/Neuwirth DAMN YANKEES.

"Some people can thrive and bloom living life in a living room, that's perfect for some people of one hundred and five. But I at least gotta try, when I think of all the sights that I gotta see, all the places I gotta play, all the things that I gotta be at"

[LizzieCurry]

re: Musicals that were heavily revised for their revival?#14

Posted: 7/11/08 at 4:34am

What did they change in Les Miz? I thought it wasn't really a "Revival", and they just brought it back to Broadway in its original form?

Not that much.
It wasn't "heavily" revised.

"This thread reads like a series of White House memos." — Mister Matt

[dramarama2]

re: Musicals that were heavily revised for their revival?#15

Posted: 7/11/08 at 6:17am

Les Miz was pretty much just condensed as the producers felt that it needed a more intimate feel. So...

Altered Smaller Sets
Less focus on general design of show
Smaller Orchestrations...

ok...CRAP ORCHESTRATIONS - Most of the string, brass and woodwind section were replaced by synthesizers...

That's Chris Jahnke for you...MAKING US ORCHESTRATORS PROUD!

A little known fact is that in the original screenplay, Pan's Labyrinth was Pan's FLAByrinth. Hmmmmmmm...glad they changed it.

[folkyboy]

re: Musicals that were heavily revised for their revival?#16

Posted: 7/11/08 at 6:59am

i can't believe no one mentioned this but:

SHOW BOAT - the 1927 version is drastically different than the 1994 version Hal Prince did

[LuPonatic]

re: Musicals that were heavily revised for their revival?#17

Posted: 7/11/08 at 8:03am

I totally think the 2006 Pajama Game counts. It is very different. And I think some of those book revisions were needed. Although the basic story is the same, Sid is a different man in the revival, not quite the womanizing jerk the original paints him as.

[StockardFan]

re: Musicals that were heavily revised for their revival?#18

Posted: 7/11/08 at 8:26am

I was going to say Grease as well.

KFTC!!!!!

[changinandhow]

re: Musicals that were heavily revised for their revival?#19

Posted: 7/11/08 at 8:52am

From what I've heard, Side Show is very different this time around, which I'm not so happy about. I really hope they didn't cut We Share Everything...

Slight threadjack - hate to break it to you, but I've seen a song list from the reading and...

[once a month]

re: Musicals that were heavily revised for their revival?#20

Posted: 7/11/08 at 8:55am

Carousel?
Chicago?
Assassins?

[husk_charmer]

re: Musicals that were heavily revised for their revival?#21

Posted: 7/11/08 at 9:12am

onceamonth-
Carousel, Chicago and Assassins have barely changed. In fact, other than one song being added and a minor role assignment change, Assassins was the same as it was in 1991.

http://www.youtube.com/huskcharmer

[Phyllis Rogers Stone]

re: Musicals that were heavily revised for their revival?#22

Posted: 7/11/08 at 9:13am

Isn't the answer virtually every musical?

[defyingravity11]

re: Musicals that were heavily revised for their revival?#23

Posted: 7/11/08 at 9:13am

I believe 110 in the Shade had numerous script and musical arrangment changes.

[Phyllis Rogers Stone]

re: Musicals that were heavily revised for their revival?#24

Posted: 7/11/08 at 9:16am

Folky, I don't think a single version of Show Boat is the same as the next.