Well, I don't think we'll ever know exactly WHY those two are out - if it was their decision not to do it, whether they even wanted to or not, if they were offered the part, etc, etc. I'd like to think that whatever it was, it was a sensical, informed decision.
If you've seen Daphne recently, you'd know that there is NO WAY she could convincingly play Mimi. I love her, but it would just look ridiculous. I saw her a few months ago and she's beautiful, but absolutely does not look like she's in her early 20's anymore - or even close to.
But by this logic, you should have something against every actress to take on the part on stage, in succession after Daphne, no? I mean, she originated that role. She created it as it is now. So, everyone after her is emanating what she's created, and in essence, replacing her. But that's not a problem because they're not performing with the originals like Rosario is? I don't get it.
I just feel like arguments like this are silly, because hey - why not be pleased that you have even six of fifteen? Think of how it could've been, and just be grateful for that you have. Maybe so that everyone would be "replaced" instead of just two, Columbus should've gone with his teenybopper, incapable pop icons.
Trust me, I know how you feel, because I used to be the same way - but I'm just at the point where I think all of this petty nitpicking is kind of... pointless. It's done.
You just can't please 'em all.
A work of art is an invitation to love.
Updated On: 8/16/05 at 11:16 AM