Shakespeare Identified
Shakespeare Identified#1
Posted: 5/27/12 at 2:47pm
Sir Derek Jacobi, Michael York, Mark Rylance, Orson Wells and other thespians have doubted or rejected the idea of the man from Stratford-on-Avon as the author known as "William Shakespeare." Most recently, Roland Emmerich asserted in his movie, Anonymous, that Edward de Vere, 17th Earl of Oxford was Shakespeare, the son of Queen Elizabeth and her lover, who produced a child, Henry Wriothesley, 3rd Earl of Southampon.
The historical assertions in the movie are based on my book, Oxford: Son of Queen Elizabeth I, which can be found on Amazon.com, or for more information on the whole debate, and why the above is true, please visit my website, www.shakespeareidentified.com.
Please don't post any wild assertions of the established facts you learned in college: the established truth that has been wrong for generations. (I have heard them all before. Visit the website, I answer most of them there.) There are good reasons why the above men support the Earl of Oxford as the author. Mainly, they are drawn to Oxford to help them understand the works and the characters that Shakespeare/Oxford presents.
Paul Streitz
Shakespeare Identified.
Shakespeare Identified#2
Posted: 5/27/12 at 2:53pmGoing for the hard sell, eh?
--Aristotle
Shakespeare Identified#2
Posted: 5/27/12 at 2:57pmVery hard sell; it was totally Christopher Marlowe.
Shakespeare Identified#3
Posted: 5/27/12 at 3:04pm
Your link stinks. I use that phrase for all its multiple meanings.
Team Will.
Shakespeare Identified#4
Posted: 5/27/12 at 3:23pmThe lady doth protest too much, me thinks.
Shakespeare Identified#5
Posted: 5/27/12 at 3:49pm
And if anyone wants to read some actual scholarship on the subject...
Contested Will
Shakespeare Identified#6
Posted: 5/27/12 at 4:22pmThanks, AC. I'm put off by a writer who starts a thread announcing his view and then immediately demands that no contrary positions be posted.
Shakespeare Identified#7
Posted: 5/27/12 at 4:26pmHe didn't say that, exactly. He just demanded that "wild assertions of the established facts" not be put in this thread. And by that, one can assume he meant "assertions of the established facts."
Shakespeare Identified#8
Posted: 5/27/12 at 4:30pmThis is also coming from the same person who just casually slipped his own musical into the discussion of the musicals that have been considered the best throughout the history of the art form.
Shakespeare Identified#9
Posted: 5/27/12 at 4:36pm
You just have to love someone that starts a thread on a DISCUSSION board, that obviously does not actually have a desire for discussion.
And because other have 'doubted' or 'rejected' proves nothing. They are ACTORS for Sondheim's sake -- and while they are entitled to their opinion -- they aren't the end all to this discussion.
I understand the argument against Willie being the author, but stranger things have happened all throughout time.
Shakespeare Identified#10
Posted: 5/27/12 at 4:38pmI hope you all will kickstart and then buy my upcoming chap book, "From 'My Fair Lady' to 'OH, JOHNNY': The Great Seismic Shift in Musical Theatre, Part 1." Thanking you in advance.
Shakespeare Identified#11
Posted: 5/27/12 at 4:53pm
People who believe Edward de Vere was the author of Shakespeare's plays also believe that he was the illegitimate child of Elizabeth I...and then grew up to be her lover. So, yeah, these are the folks on that side of the debate.
One of them even wrote a children's book about it.
Shakespeare Identified#12
Posted: 5/27/12 at 5:00pmI saw ACT in San Francisco's terrible production of Amy Freed's "Beard of Avon" back in 2002 and THAT'S what I think of when I encounter the wild assertions of the Oxfordians.
Shakespeare Identified#13
Posted: 5/27/12 at 5:01pmI thought that it had already been established that Dr. Seuss wrote the plays.
Shakespeare Identified#14
Posted: 5/27/12 at 5:05pm
He didn't say that, exactly. He just demanded that "wild assertions of the established facts" not be put in this thread. And by that, one can assume he meant "assertions of the established facts."
Yes, you're quoting correctly, Namo. But my comment referred to "a writer" in general rather mentioning this one by name. I was speaking of the principle of the matter.
I believe the principle is the same, whether the OP announces a ban on all contrary views or merely certain ones.
Shakespeare Identified#15
Posted: 5/27/12 at 5:06pmI thought Shakespeare's daughter Susannah collaborated on the Seuss things. She obviously couldn't have written "Hop on Pop!," being a simple farm girl.
Broadway Legend Joined: 8/25/06
Shakespeare Identified#16
Posted: 5/27/12 at 7:05pm
Well, now, wait a minute ... if Edward could hop on mom, why couldn't Susannah Hop on Pop?!?!?
:o
Broadway Legend Joined: 9/30/08
Shakespeare Identified#17
Posted: 5/28/12 at 11:39amThe fact that so many of the plays appeared after Oxford's death is kind of hard to explain, no?
Shakespeare Identified#18
Posted: 5/28/12 at 11:43amOxfordians believe that their candidate was a child prodigy who completed the entire Shakespeare corpus at a young age. They believe, for example that Edward de Vere wrote A MIDSUMMER'S NIGHT DREAM at age nine. They have an answer for every factual impossibility...which are many.
Shakespeare Identified#19
Posted: 5/28/12 at 1:15pm
Oxfordians actually believe that the post-1604 plays are either incomplete or collaborations, indicating that their man wrote at least part of them and the rest was written by others.
I think the arguments are silly and, ultimately, diminishing to the whole body of work.
Shakespeare Mis-Identified#20
Posted: 5/28/12 at 11:13pm
The "Oxfordians" who believe that Shakespeare couldn't possibly have written his own plays are the British equivalent of the American "Birthers," who believe that Barack Obama couldn't possibly have been born an American.
Well, guess what, Professor Crazyman? I don't believe Andrew Lloyd Webber wrote all the music he claims to have written!
Shakespeare Mis-Identified#21
Posted: 5/29/12 at 11:33amBut Joey, that's actually provable.
Shakespeare Mis-Identified#22
Posted: 5/29/12 at 12:19pmOh, come on you guys! Everyone knows that James Patterson and his team of ghostwriters were responsible for every single one of those plays.
Joined: 12/31/69
Shakespeare Mis-Identified#23
Posted: 5/29/12 at 12:24pmSuper-intelligent monkeys from the future wrote Shakespeare's plays. DUH.
Shakespeare Mis-Identified#24
Posted: 5/29/12 at 12:30pmJoe, isn't that the same as what I just posted?
Videos




