I think the Brooklyn ovation was deserved, I loved Eden's warbling, though I gather it wasn't to everyone's taste.
What I find hilarious is that because I am criticising Lennon, people on this thread have taken umbrage to my views on their new favourite show and have decided to attack my personality, concluding that I have a "profound" personality disorder. Well, this is obviously the case because I didn't like a moralising, unconvincing, wet rag of a show. I MUST be screwed up! Actually, I'm not. The show was awful. That's that.
I am sure I was at Lennon, believe me, there's no way I could have dreamt anything that bad. I was sat in row N, I have my ticket if you'd like to see it.
Slacker: If you don't like my posting about Lennon, don't read my posts. I have to discuss how awful it was simply to relieve myself of the immense burden of poor theatre it has shed upon my soul. As to whether the standing ovation is deserved... The performers deserve an ovation for singing well and doing their best to interpret weak material. The show itself does not. By encouraging people to stand and clap, the cast are bypassing the audience's choice of whether or not to stand. This is one example of a fauxvation.
Showbiz: I like the term 'fauxvation' and hope people think it's appropriate. Perhaps you could come up with a different term to express this. I think the show you are currently shilling is corny.
lildogs: I often applaud weakly after a song that I think was poo, or during a show I think is rubbish. I kinda hope that it'll give people the message that they are not obliged to traumatise their palms with clapping after a song if they don't think it was good. It's part of that "If I clap really loudly, that means I am having a good time and that this show was worth the megabucks I paid for it." mentality.
"Jane, I've been dealt a blow - I've been dealt a blow, Jane."