"But the judges cannot prevent personal feelings from affecting their votes. Some may have gotten a little tired of Kristin's persona and may be unhappy that she deserted the theater for such a long time.
Kelli O'Hara, on the other hand, just goes from show to show, through two pregnancies, and picks up her annual Tony nomination. The judges may feel that it is time that she won the award."
This kind of thinking makes no sense to me, though I can imagine some voters think along these lines. Just because O'Hara has made the decision to not leave the New York theater, other actresses who have should be punished? Perhaps the actresses who decide to work elsewhere aren't getting as many Broadway offers that they deem good enough for their time and efforts.
Besides, Chenoweth was last on Broadway in Promises, Promises, which only closed in 2011; it's not like she's been away for twenty years. On the Twentieth Century has been in the works for several years, and Chenoweth always seemed like she was eager to get back on the boards and do this part. She didn't swear of theater and then come groveling back, asking for critics to love her.
It doesn't seem like Audra McDonald's decision to do television affected her standing with Tony voters, so why should anyone else be punished for looking elsewhere for career choices?
When I see the phrase "the ____ estate", I imagine a vast mansion in the country full of monocled men and high-collared women receiving letters about productions across the country and doing spit-takes at whatever they contain.
-Kad