pmensky said: "No, Billy is not a difficult role to sing. It’s written for a prepubescent boy whose voice hasn’t changed, so no matter how good he sounded singing back then, that would be no indication of how he sounds now.”
Again, I wasn’t saying that Billy is a difficult sing compared to many other musical theatre roles. But just because a role is written for a child to sing doesn’t mean the child doesn’t have to ACTUALLY be able to sing. There’s a big gap between “child singing Twinkle Twinkle at a recital” vs “able to sing Electricity on the West End.”
And speaking as a former pre-pubescent boy who learned to sing before, during, and after my voice change: just because I had to deal with major adjustments doesn’t mean I started from a totally clean slate when my voice changed. One can still make use of technical training and/or innate talent from before a voice change, even if that alone isn’t sufficient to carry it through. As I specifically said, it would require additional training for him to sing professionally again, but he probably still has a foundational sense of musicality, some raw unpolished talent, and/or understanding of the art of singing, that just needs to be recalibrated and re-fined for his adult voice.
Sure, he might do a play someday when his movie career isn’t on a roll, and he isn’t making 10 million per picture."
We’re in agreement there. That was exactly what I was saying in my earlier post above.
Updated On: 3/21/22 at 12:01 AM