It didn't strike me as a personal snub last year. Roberts was mediocre and the five who received nominations all gave more accomplished performances than she did and deserved to be singled out. The ONLY reason to nominate Roberts last year would have been because of her fame, not because of her actual performance and thankfully the nominating committee didn't do that (same with Denzel in Julius Caesar).
Moore wasn't as bad as Roberts, but she also wasn't very good either in my opinion and seemed well out of her depth on stage opposite Nighy (who probably will get a nod, though his category is also very competitive). She's a truly great film actress, but just didn't seem to have the presence and power and stage chops that the role required -- something most critics (and I'm guessing most of the nominating committee) will agree with. Beyond that, in a season with White, Redgrave, Lansbury, Seldes, Pinkins, Best, et al all competing for five slots, there's simply no room for Moore. Perhaps she might have had a shot in a less competitive season, but this year? No way. Again, her omission, like Roberts', will be nothing personal.
"What a story........ everything but the bloodhounds snappin' at her rear end." -- Birdie
[http://margochanning.broadwayworld.com/]
"The Devil Be Hittin' Me" -- Whitney