I was just wondering what the "rules" are for naming a role featured or leading? I was thinking about Light in the Piazza and wondered why Clara (and maybe even) Fabrizio weren't considered leading actors (for the nominations). They were really both in most of the show, almost as much as the role of Margaret.
If an actor is above the title, they are considered leading. Below the titled is considered featured. Producers can petition to have an actor moved to the other category. And sometimes the committee moves performers themselves.
Using your example, I think Margaret guides the show much more than Clara does. They might have the same amount of stage time, but Clara isn't as much of a force in the show as Margaret is.
If we're going by awards' standards, then ljay's definition is the strictest. A famous example of this would be Joel Grey being considered a leading actor by the Tony nominating committee for playing Amos Hart in Chicago, which is obviously a featured role. Grey won the Drama Desk Award for Featured Actor and was widely favored to win the Tony, but because the producers didn't petition to have him moved, he was considered Leading and wasn't even nominated. But I think givesmevoice makes a good point about which character is the catalyst for the action of the show, or whose role contributes most significantly to the play.
Something that has interested me, actually, is when roles are recategorized when shows are revived. For example, Viola Davis was considered a Leading Actress for Fences, whereas Mary Alice was Featured.
Viola was billed as a star of Fences.
Mary Alice wasn't in the original production. Only James Earl Jones had star billing.
"Featured" has come to mean "supporting." That's not what it meant originally. It just meant "featured billing." I wish they would change that.
Viola Davis was billed below the title and had to be petitioned into the Leading Actress category. Here's the article from Playbill on that: http://www.playbill.com/news/article/139184-Tony-Rulings-Enron-Fences-Royal-Family-Eligible-for-Best-Score-American-Idiot-Fela-Are-Not.
As for The Light in the Piazza, I could see the argument for both Margaret and Clara being leads . . . but between the two Margaret makes more sense AND splitting them up gives each a real opportunity to win.
Videos