broadwayguy2 said: "Cats is not a terrible show. It's a solid concept review and the original had impressive production values, whether the massive Broadway production or the far more intimate and notably different original London production (and the very low budget version that initially opened.) the original staging is beyond iconic and I am very grateful.
That stated, shows that run as long as Cats did usually become dusty, terribly maintained and horribly tired.
I strenuously disagree with your assertion that long running shows become dusty, terribly maintained and horribly tired. I worked at Cats for two years and spent three years at Phantom. I saw each of these shows eight times a week over the span of those years as new people came and went....Long running shows have the same problems new shows have. Good night. Bad nights. Good performers. Bad performers.
I'm not sure what you're basing your statement on. Have you ever worked on a long running show?
The greater issue for me was always the type of audience that is attracted to a show such as Cats. I'd gladly see the show in a regional or stock house of any size and appreciate the show for what it is, and I have. But on Broadway, in a commercial setting, the audiences that gravity to Cats make me MISERABLE.
"