Pretty positive. She thinks it's too long and too ballad heavy (the only ballads she likes were Fly Fly Away and Goodbye), but has a lot of potential. Wants it to be lighter.
How nice to read a review for this that was actually well-written! It certainly doesn't hurt that it's positive as I'm rooting for this one.
If we're not having fun, then why are we doing it?
These are DISCUSSION boards, not mutual admiration boards. Discussion only occurs when we are willing to hear what others are thinking, regardless of whether it is alignment to our own thoughts.
Tveit seem to be getting nothing but high praise - love it!
2016 These Paper Bullets (1/02) Our Mother's Brief Affair (1/06), Dragon Boat Racing (1/08), Howard - reading (1/28), Shear Madness (2/10), Fun Home (2/17), Women Without Men (2/18), Trip Of Love (2/21), The First Gentleman -reading (2/22), Southern Comfort (2/23), The Robber Bridegroom (2/24), She Loves Me (3/11), Shuffle Along (4/12), Shear Madness (4/14), Dear Evan Hansen (4/16), American Psycho (4/23), Tuck Everlasting (5/10), Indian Summer (5/15), Peer Gynt (5/18), Broadway's Rising Stars (7/11), Trip of Love (7/27), CATS (7/31), The Layover (8/17), An Act Of God (8/31), The Curious Incident of the Dog in the Night-Time (8/24), Heisenberg (10/12), Fiddler On The Roof (11/02), Othello (11/23), Dear Evan Hansen (11/26), Les Liaisons Dangereuses (12/21) 2017 In Transit (2/01), Groundhog Day (4/04), Ring Twice For Miranda (4/07), Church And State (4/10), The Lucky One (4/19), Ernest Shackleton Loves Me (5/16), Building The Wall (5/19), Indecent (6/01), Six Degrees of Separation (6/09), Marvin's Room (6/28), A Doll's House Pt 2 (7/25) Curvy Widow (8/01)
Wow, this review is so different from the FIRST WIVES CLUB review. It sounds like the show has some issues but it's not a massive failure, and the critic seemed to be rooting for the show to succeed and offered what I thought was some helpful points for the creative team to work on as the show makes its way to Broadway. The Variety review of FIRST WIVES CLUB basically begged for everyone involved to keep that hot mess from coming to NY.
"Some people can thrive and bloom living life in a living room, that's perfect for some people of one hundred and five. But I at least gotta try, when I think of all the sights that I gotta see, all the places I gotta play, all the things that I gotta be at"
It should be noted that THE FIRST WIVES CLUB and CATCH ME IF YOU CAN were reviewed by two different Variety critics, though.
Tonya Pinkins: Then we had a "Lot's Wife" last June that was my personal favorite. I'm still trying to get them to let me sing it at some performance where we get to sing an excerpt that's gone.
Tony Kushner: You can sing it at my funeral.
So very true. CATCH ME IF YOU CAN's review was by a woman, while THE FIRST WIVES CLUB's was by a man, who have been fairly universal in dissing the subject matter. In other words they've been dragged into this show against their will, against their reason, and against their character (to paraphrase Elizabeth Bennet).
That being said, one cannot necessarily rely on a woman to give a positive review to female-oriented material, as often they feel the need to act like they are men and not subject to stereotypes.
BTW, I noticed that no one is griping about the lack of *big* marquee names in this cast. Odd...
It is definitely a male minded musical. All the women are portrayed as sluts or naive (or both). Oh yeah...and Linda Hart plays the accordion (please cut this. I adore Linda Hart but her part is useless). I'm slightly amazed that a creative team made entirely of gay men came up with something without one powerful woman. They could easily cut all the female roles without really impacting much of the plot.
This is the kind of show that would sound great on a cast recording but cause the viewer to go "Huh?" when viewing it with McNally's uneven mess of a book.
I think Tviet could actually be used more. He's a fantastic triple threat and there are large chunks where he's missed. Norbert is superb but he gets far too much stage time in relation to the, let's face it, more interesting Tviet character (not knocking Butz here but the story is really about Abergnale).
Again, as I've said, for a chase musical it's really slow.
And Wopat's part has been explanded far too much.
Mitchell's choreography is top notch but I kind of wish he'd have directed it too as the piece would feel more fluid. O'Brien's direction is very uninspired.
EDIT: Wanted to add about the direction. The scenes between Abergnale and the detective never overlap as they should. There's too much waiting for scene shifts (I image they don't want to completely steal City of Angels' half color half black and white idea but if you're going to steal at least rob the whole bank).
It felt like City of Angels (they even steal the black and white motif) meets Dirty Rotten Scoundrels.
Mackie's costumes were lackluster and often misplaced. Rockwell's LCD screen was annoying (is this really the future of set desingn? I hope not).
This all is fixable. There just needs to be more focus on Abergnale, the pace needs to be picked up x 10, the score needs a few bouncier tunes, and McNally either needs to be replaced (where is Meehan when you need him?) or forced to cut his extraneous dialogue. I'd say at least half of the score, completely fine songs all, isn't integral to telling the story. Updated On: 8/9/09 at 07:41 PM
Keep in mind this is technically a 5th Avenue production. There are no producers over the title or mentioned in the playbill. I also find it odd that Dreamworks doesn't appear to be attached since it's their film.
I saw "Catch Me" for a second time today (First time was opening night) and I actually liked it better the second time after being just so-so about it the first time around.
Like a lot of the reviews and the comments on threads say about this show, it does have some work to do to but I think its on the right path and in its current state is still a good show worth watching.
Today's matinee started at 1:30 and when I walked out and checked my watch it was 4:20. So yes, some of the songs need to either be cut entirely or changed and I feel the relationship between Abagnale and his dad and Hanratty could be developed more to make the story more cohesive.
Every time Aaron was on stage I was totally trasnfixed by his amazing performance. If this transfers to Broadway, he definitely has the chance to go from breakout star to Leading Man status.
BobbyBubbly, the protagonist's last name is Abagnale, not "Abergnale."
Tonya Pinkins: Then we had a "Lot's Wife" last June that was my personal favorite. I'm still trying to get them to let me sing it at some performance where we get to sing an excerpt that's gone.
Tony Kushner: You can sing it at my funeral.
Actually I think "the creators of Hairspray", as all the publicity in Seattle reads, is the star of the show. Audiences are desperate to be part of the Hairspray phenomena 7 years ago in the same city.
Not the same this time around, unfortunately.
And though he's hardly a film or television star, a good chunk of the audience knows who Butz is.
I have to say... I love everyone involved in the show... AND to be REALLY HONEST the show looks and sounds like a HUGE DUD! The video they previewed on here was terrible.
I can see how watching some video clips might give the you impression that this show is a dud, but I've seen it and I agree with both the Variety and the Seattle Times reviews. There's potential here, an amazing cast and a strong score, but there's some real work to be done to make this into a great musical.
I read an interview where Scott Wittman where he said this show was like Les Mis with chicks. This is an intriguing idea: What if Jean ValJean and Javert made friends and teamed up at the end (and it was the 1960s with lots of chicks?) This is the story that needs to be focused on.
I also think there's an issue with the songs not meshing with the story. I had a chance to listen to some of the demos months ago, and most of those songs have made it into the show with little change. It's a great demo, but the end result feels a bit like a "jukebox" show, where those pre-existing songs have been forced into a not entirely related storyline.