From everyone's favorite columnist, Michael Riedel.
Weissler and a slew of producers want to transfer the show. The theater in question? The St. James, in between the runs of Producers and Young Frankenstein, depending on whether or not Lane/Broderick close-out the former.
The downside of a summer run? No Donna Murphy, who is committed to LoveMusik.
I would hate to see Donna or Victoria Clark replaced in the leading roles. My guess is LoveMusik is going to unfortunately be a lackluster production, freeing up Cerveris and Murphy for other things, among them a Follies revival.
well now i know how the RAVINIA people felt who didnt want Patti to do GYPSY again; they wanted it be their own special evening(s) of magick, never to be repeated.
but i honestly believe the magic of the ENCORES! production of FOLLIES *cant* be repeated...i dont think that they would be able to get that kind of cast & crew or that level of audience enthusiasm again.
I kinda wish instead of pouring all their energy into a possible revival (that some don't think will happen or even repeat the success) they would just record it as is.
I have several names, one is Julian2. I am also The Opps Girl. But cross me, and I become Bitch Dooku!
or video tape and it and then put in on PBS for all us poor folk
"Whenever I get gloomy with the state of the world, I think about the arrivals gate at Heathrow Airport. General opinion's starting to make out that we live in a world of hatred and greed, but I don't see that. It seems to me that love is everywhere. Often it's not particularly dignified or newsworthy, but it's always there - fathers and sons, mothers and daughters, husbands and wives, boyfriends, girlfriends, old friends. When the planes hit the Twin Towers, as far as I know none of the phone calls from the people on board were messages of hate or revenge - they were all messages of love. If you look for it, I've got a sneaky feeling you'll find that love actually is all around."
FOLLIES can't play at the St. James, because Christine Baranski is opening there in MAME. Right after the productions of HAIR and BYE BYE BIRDIE from Encores open.
Can't they just do a cast recording with the original Encores! cast. The speculated revival wouldn't feature Donna Murphy (every single critic raved about her performance), Victor Garber, Jenny Powers (committed to Grease) et al.
"Some people can thrive and bloom living life in a living room, that's perfect for some people of one hundred and five. But I at least gotta try, when I think of all the sights that I gotta see, all the places I gotta play, all the things that I gotta be at"
I completly agree with Ray. Instead of spending the money on a transfer, they should focus on making the cast recording. It would be worth it, much more than the transfer.
Well, Encores wouldn't be financing the majority of the transfer, the producer(s)/investors would. However, Encores would (along with a record label) finance the recording, so, two different scenarios altogether.
In terms of Donna not being able to do it, Bebe Neuwirth would be a great choice to replace her for a transfer IMO.
As fans, our concern shouldn't be if it makes money. Any production of Follies has a hard time making money. As fans we should be excited to see this wonderful production again, even just for a limited run.
In terms of Donna not being able to do it, Bebe Neuwirth would be a great choice to replace her for a transfer IMO.
- That's what I said. But Michael Bennett shot me down and told me her lisp would get in the way.
The thing is, though, one of the things that made this production so special was Murphy's relevatory turn as Phyllis. I can't see Neuwirth's Phyllis being in the same vein as Murphy's. Warmth is not her strong suit.
"How do you like THAT 'misanthropic panache,' Mr. Goldstone?" - PalJoey
Our concern HAS to be if it makes money or not. That ultimately determines the probability of the production.
- But any Follies fan knows it's almost impossible for a production of this show to make money, so it's a useless concern. Wasn't the only version to make money the original London production, which completely revised the show?
[Obligatory question]: Remembering her past history, can Donna Murphy sustain a Broadway run?
[Obligatory statement]: Too bad the Mark Hellinger is a church now because the show would play great in that theater.
If anyone ever tells you that you put too much Parmesan cheese on your pasta, stop talking to them. You don't need that kind of negativity in your life.
I agree with Kringas, one of the things that had everyone talking about was Murphy's re-invention of Phyllis. Of course Neuwirth is one of the most obvious choices, but perhaps too obvious, as much as I love her as a performer (I suggested her as Phyllis many times before Murphy was cast), she would play the role as it is typically played, what made Murphy's Phyllis so successful was the inner fragility that was always embedded with her dialogue/songs, if you notice her "Could I Leave You?" was not full of bitchy remarks but full of the pain of loving Benjamin Stone. As everyone has said it's not gonna happen either way so moot point.
"Some people can thrive and bloom living life in a living room, that's perfect for some people of one hundred and five. But I at least gotta try, when I think of all the sights that I gotta see, all the places I gotta play, all the things that I gotta be at"
I guess they believe third time's the charm? Follies has never been a success on Broadway or the West End. And people complained that Les Mis came back so fast? Didn't we just have a Follies Broadway revival??? Good grief!
"What can you expect from a bunch of seitan worshippers?" - Reginald Tresilian
I don't think Murphy would be too much of an issue. LoveMusik is scheduled to run through June 17th and the tentative closing date for The Producers is a week later on June 24th. Let's assume a few weeks of rehearsals. It could easily open in mid-late July at the St. James and run for two-three months before closing in time for previews of Young Frankenstein to begin in early October.
Then again I could be grossly underestimating the time needed for rehearsals.