Even before its original Menier run has closed and its West End Transfer opens, the shows London producers and New York counterparts are in advanced talks for the production to open on Broadway before the end of 2009. It has a short London run opening in March that is expected to run until September. Negotiations are in full swing with Vanessa Redgrave and daughter Natasha to headline the New York production.
Oh God, no. With the exception of the actress who played Madame Armfeldt, her name escapes me, this was a completely humorless production. Please let it fall through and let a proper production come to fruition.
"Sing the words, Patti!!!!" Stephen Sondheim to Patti LuPone.
know nothing about the London production, but I have a question and comment. Why does it have to go through London 1st? I mean, come on American producers! can't they just produce it now and have it ready without it being a production from London? ..and will that mean it will be the London Cast Recording that we get?...like the lousy London cast recording of Sunday in the Park with George?...I'm just saying,,,
I don't get it. How can this happen if we have a roundabout production next season?
"You can't overrate Bernadette Peters. She is such a genius. There's a moment in "Too Many Mornings" and Bernadette doing 'I wore green the last time' - It's a voice that is just already given up - it is so sorrowful. Tragic. You can see from that moment the show is going to be headed into such dark territory and it hinges on this tiny throwaway moment of the voice." - Ben Brantley (2022)
"Bernadette's whole, stunning performance [as Rose in Gypsy] galvanized the actors capable of letting loose with her. Bernadette's Rose did take its rightful place, but too late, and unseen by too many who should have seen it" Arthur Laurents (2009)
"Sondheim's own favorite star performances? [Bernadette] Peters in ''Sunday in the Park,'' Lansbury in ''Sweeney Todd'' and ''obviously, Ethel was thrilling in 'Gypsy.'' Nytimes, 2000
How could it be possible to have a "humorless" production. The lyrics could be read on a bare stage by the contestants on the Biggest Loser and it would still be funny.
Isn't there an upcoming production that's going to premiere in Westchester over the summer?
2008: Feb. 18- Rent, Feb. 19- Curtains, April 18- Xanadu, April 22- Wicked, April 26- Legally Blonde, May 31- Wicked, June 13- The Little Mermaid, June 28- Wicked and Young Frankenstein, July 2- The Little Mermaid, July 6- A Chorus Line and Legally Blonde, August 16- Xanadu, September 13- Legally Blonde and 13, September 28- Xanadu and Spring Awakening, Oct. 12-GYPSY and [title of show], Oct. 19- Hairspray & Legally Blonde, Nov. 9- Wicked and 13, Dec. 14-13, Dec. 26- Billy Elliot, 2009: Jan 1- Shrek, Jan 2- 13 and Wicked, Jan 4- 13, Feb 17- In The Heights, Feb 19- Billy Elliot, Feb 22- Sweeney Todd (tour), March 28- Mary Poppins, April 4- Mamma Mia!, April 15- Jersey Boys (on tour), April 25- next to normal & 9 to 5
May 1- Billy Elliot, May 3- Spelling Bee (tour), May 8- Chicago, May 21- Wicked, June 6- Everyday Rapture, June 23- The Wiz, June 25- Hair July 15- Shrek, August 9- Wicked, September 7- Rock of Ages, October 11- Next To Normal, October 23- The Marvelous Wonderettes, November 7- Ragtime November 29- Dreamgirls, December 25- Billy Elliot, December 30- Finian's Rainbow, 2010: January 9- Bye Bye Birdie, January 16- Memphis February 17- The Phantom of The Opera, February 18- God of Carnage, March 7- Billy Elliot, March 31- American Idiot
I don't want to see Natasha butcher Desiree. Can't they find someone else?
If anyone ever tells you that you put too much Parmesan cheese on your pasta, stop talking to them. You don't need that kind of negativity in your life.
SueleenGay- Believe me, it can be done. Act 2 was rather enjoyable, much thanks to Madame Armfeldt and Trevor Nunn finally realizing he was directing a COMEDY, but Act 1 got no laughs. None.
"Sing the words, Patti!!!!" Stephen Sondheim to Patti LuPone.
It will be tragic if they transfer this with the same London orchestrations. They need to use the Tunick orchestrations, or at least a reduction. We do not need another SUNDAY.
Agreed. I loved Sunday in the Menier and the teeny orchestrations were perfectly justified there because it's a teeny space, but it really galled me that they used the exact same orchestrations on Broadway. Studio 54 is not a freaking black box theater, so the tiny orchestra just made the producers look like cheap bastards. And if anything, the effect of a reduced orchestrations would be even worse on A Little Night Music's more classical, lush score.
Of course, now it's all going to be done with two violins and a piccolo, isn't it?
I kind of hope Sondheim will step in this time and have the orchestrations beefed up. The score needs the Tunick orchestrations. The London revival sounds like a cheap imitation of Tunick.
From my understanding, with the Sunday orchestrations, Sondheim figured that the Roundabout was a non-profit so they couldn't afford more musicians, and the Roundabout people were like, "Oh, we totally could have afforded it but Sondheim didn't say anything", which is so freaking disingenuous it makes me a bit mad to this day. It could happen the exact same way this time.
I completely agree, but I would think Sondheim will be smarter this time around. And since it looks like this revival will not be Roundabout, they should be able to afford more musicians.
Wickedfan and I must have seen two different productions, because when I saw this show last month, it was deliciously witty and sophisticated (and was enthusiastically received by the audience the night I saw it). Broadway would be lucky to have it. I have little intrest in seeing Natasha Richardson failing to sing the score, though. Hannah Waddington was divine as someone who could both sing and act the score AND be age-appropriate.
Hannah is the same age as Eva Dahlbeck was when Smiles of a Summer Night came out. Women got old at a much different age back in the day. Richardson would be far more age appropriate than most of the actresses who tend to get cast, but I have no interest in hearing her butcher the score.
Compare Hannah to Glynis Johns not Eva Dahlbeck. Though A LITTLE NIGHT MUSIC is based on SMILES OF A SUMMER NIGHT, Sondheim and Wheeler clearly meant for an older actress to play the role, it's in the book, it's in the score. Richardson is the perfect age for the part and I'd be delighted to see her interpret the role on Broadway, Hannah is simply too young and just not really enough of a name to open a revival of this magnitude on Broadway.
"Some people can thrive and bloom living life in a living room, that's perfect for some people of one hundred and five. But I at least gotta try, when I think of all the sights that I gotta see, all the places I gotta play, all the things that I gotta be at"
But in the time the show is set, wouldn't a woman nearing 40 be considered "late in [her] career"?
I thought the younger casting in the London production worked very well - especially in the case of Charlotte. How does it make sense that Anne is 18 and went to school with Charlotte's sister, and then most productions cast Charlotte as 45?