. — Page 57

It's the internal polling that would make hin drop out, not the public pills, which he could say are "rigged" and "unfair." All of the internal polling shows he is losing the swing states and even sone of the traditionally red states.

Even Breitbart.com. which is his biggest support network commissioned thier own poll to prove the other polls wrong. Breitbart's results: Clinton in a solid lead and gaining.

Just when you thought the Trump campaign couldn't get any classier, they go and add Roger Ailes.

http://www.nytimes.com/2016/08/17/us/politics/donald-trump-roger-ailes.html?utm_source=huffingtonpost.com&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=pubexchange&mtrref=www.huffingtonpost.com&gwh=F66DBE80AC8A26D869D9A38484DB0914&gwt=pay

I do not envy the moderators.

Trump campaign shakeup is just plain ole scary! Idiot from Brietbart??

The thing is, polls/statistics can be spun lots of different ways. There are SO many, and most people--especially toothless uneducated middle-America--don't read the fine print. And while I definitely prefer her over Donald Crazytown, anyone stuck on "the polls say Hillary's up by this/many points" from day to day up til the election may not vote bc they think it's a sure thing. People need to vote no matter what the polls say. Even if you don't like the two main candidates--or know someone who feels that way--encourage them to write someone in.

PS--anyone see Michael Moore's open letter to Ivanka this week, and/or his article just yesterday making the case that Donald's sabotaging himself on purpose? Sorry but I love him.

http://www.alternet.org/election-2016/trump-self-sabotage-campaign

adamgreer said: "Not more than a month ago, Moore went on Bill Maher and declared he thought Trump was going to win the election. He's certainly changed his tune awfully quickly."

I thought the same thing. Michael Moore is one big click-bait.

This was funny, in case you misse it from the news.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IqlnoIlPskA

There is no way this is a set up to benefit Clinton. They're making specious allegations about her health and revisiting her husband's infidelities. Adding Bannon to the campaign will only lead to even more conspiracy theories directed at her.

Liza's Headband said: "Don't have any links right now but I've heard legitimate rumblings of the preparation for a Brietbart/Trump television network launch, and that is the only reason he brought Bannon on-board. Time will tell."

That makes sense, and I'd expect Sean Hannity to be their centerpiece. Not sure when Hannity's contract expires with Fox. If true, this only gives them more incentive to blow up the election as yuuuuge as possible.

Hannity has a clause allowing him to leave if Ailes leaves, so Hannity will go to the new network.

One caveat: those "legitimate rumblings" are nothing more than conjecture. No deals have m=been made, no papers drawn up, not even a handshake agreement. Just people looking at the dissolution of Fox News and confluence of Ailes and Bannon around Trump and saying, "This could be the new Fox News."

But Trump himself is the wild card, and he is more out of control than ever, so only a fool would put money on this --or any other possible outcome of Trump in this election.

I just pictured Trump as Charlie Kelly from "It's Always Sunny," screaming "WILD CARD, BITCHEZZZZZZZ" as he cuts the brakes on the van and dives out the back door.

"NYC Parks Dept. stands firmly against any unpermitted erection in city parks, no matter how small.” (Official Statement)



DEAD.