Actually, George W.Bush is the Worst President in US History and ANYONE who thinks Mitt Romney is better than Obama is a Moron!
'There are three sides to every story. My side, your side, and the truth. And no one is lying. Memories shared serve each one differently'
-Robert Evans-
Report: Obamacare penalty regressive, will cost most uninsured at least $1,000
The penalty imposed by the Affordable Care Act on citizens who elect not to purchase health insurance will be at least $1,000 for most people, and more than $12,000 for high-income earners, according to an analysis by the nonpartisan Tax Foundation.
We can see that this is a big tax, particularly on the poor, writes the Tax Foundations William McBride. Higher income families generally pay a higher amount, but actually a smaller percent of their income, making this a regressive tax.
For example, the penalty for a family of four earning $20,000 will be $2,085, more than 10 percent of its income, according to the Tax Foundation whereas a family of four making $100,000 will only have two percent of its income taken away by the government. http://taxfoundation.org/article/taxing-uninsured-latest-estimates
So this new tax will come down hard on the poor and middle class and have little effect on the rich. Sort of what the Democrats screamed the Bush Tax Cuts did!
Cook Medical says it won't build five Midwest plants due to med-tech tax
A med-tech company says it's scrapping plans to open five new plants in the Midwest because of the 2.3 percent medical-device tax that goes into effect next year to help pay for the new federal health care law. Cook Medical Inc., a Bloomington, Ind.-based company that makes a variety of medical devices, told the Indianapolis Business Journal that the federal tax will cost it between $20 million and $30 million annually. That's enough to force the company to abandon plans to build five plants over the next five years, said Pete Yonkman, Cook's executive vice president of strategic business unit.
WH Communications director Dan Pfeiffer called out Charles Krauthammer because "Krauthammer today recycles the false rumor that POTUS gave back the bust of Winston Churchill." Here's what Pfeiffer wrote: "Lately, there’s been a rumor swirling around about the current location of the bust of Winston Churchill. Some have claimed that President Obama removed the bust of Winston Churchill from the Oval Office and sent it back to the British Embassy.
Now, normally we wouldn’t address a rumor that’s so patently false, but just this morning the Washington Post’s Charles Krauthammer repeated this ridiculous claim in his column. He said President Obama “started his Presidency by returning to the British Embassy the bust of Winston Churchill that had graced the Oval Office.”
This is 100% false. The bust still in the White House (sic). In the Residence. Outside the Treaty Room."
Did you say 100% false, Dan?? Uh, you might want to AMMEND that a bit!
When you’re going to write a “fact check” article or blog post, you might want to, you know, check your facts. We know that this is usually an extremely difficult task for the Obama White House.
Here is what MEDIA MATTERS (yes, that's right MEDIA MATTERS!! LOL!!) had to say about the Churchill bust: 'A British Embassy spokesman said: “The bust of Sir Winston Churchill by Sir Jacob Epstein was uniquely lent to a foreign head of state, President George W Bush, from the Government Art Collection in the wake of 9/11 as a signal of the strong transatlantic relationship.
“It was lent for the first term of office of President Bush. When the President was elected for his second and final term, the loan was extended until January 2009.
“The new President has decided not to continue this loan and the bust has now been returned. It is on display at the Ambassador’s Residence.“"
WHY would I post something from an organization of ill repute like MEDIA MATTERS??? I find it comical that the WH Communications director is contradicting a web site that is nothing but a shill for the president and the left-wing. WOOPS!! But of course I would NEVER post anything from MM without following it up with support from more reputable organizations. So, here is an article from UK's THE TELEGRAPH:
Barack Obama sends bust of Winston Churchill on its way back to Britain Barack Obama has sent Sir Winston Churchill packing and pulse rates soaring among anxious British diplomats.
A bust of the former prime minister once voted the greatest Briton in history, which was loaned to George W Bush from the Government's art collection after the September 11 attacks, has now been formally handed back. The bronze by Sir Jacob Epstein, worth hundreds of thousands of pounds if it were ever sold on the open market, enjoyed pride of place in the Oval Office during President Bush's tenure. But when British officials offered to let Mr Obama to hang onto the bust for a further four years, the White House said: "Thanks, but no thanks." Diplomats were at first reluctant to discuss the whereabouts of the Churchill bronze, after its ejection from the seat of American power. But the British Embassy in Washington has now confirmed that it sits in the palatial residence of ambassador Sir Nigel Sheinwald, just down the road from Vice President Joe Biden's official residence.
So, will there be an APOLOGY from the White House to Charles Krauthammer? Don't hod your breath!
Come on, Playbilly. Mikey has made me a changed woman. I was going to vote for Obama because of his policies, beliefs, experience, and about a hundred other reasons.
However, he sent back a statue that was on loan, because something on loan has to go back eventually. Ah well, guess I'll vote Romney. Dang you, statue.
"I'm saying goodbye Mikey. This is the last I'm dealing with you."
I had no idea you were ever "dealing with" me! To think, we had a relationship and I NEVER KNEW IT!!
I can understand why many people on the left DESPISE this thread; the TRUTH is sometimes a hard pill to swallow. But I try to ease that pill of truth down, putting it in a nice piece of hamburg and rubbing your throat to help you swallow.
I understand completely, Wynbish. It is hard for folks like you to realize that you've been wrong all these years. But, do not dwell on the past; look to the FUTURE!
You are WRONG again, Wynbish; there were no spelling errors in my post. A spelling error is when one does not spell a word correctly because they are unfamiliar with the word's correct spelling. Since I had already spelled the word "truth" correctly in that very post, it is obvious that I knew how to spell that word. What you are referring to is a TYPO. BIG difference.
Earlier today, Dan Pfeiffer, WH Communications Director, issued an apology to Charles Krauthammer.
"Yesterday following his column, I sent the following email to Charles Krauthammer. Charles asked that I make the email public and I have agreed.
Charles,
I take your criticism seriously and you are correct that you are owed an apology. There was clearly an internal confusion about the two busts and there was no intention to deceive. I clearly overshot the runway in my post. The point I was trying to make under the belief that the Bust in the residence was the one previously in the Oval Office-- was that this oft repeated talking point about the bust being a symbol of President Obamas failure to appreciate the special relationship is false. The bust that was returned was returned as a matter of course with all the other artwork that had been loaned to President Bush for display in his Oval Office and not something that President Obama or his Administration chose to do. I still think this is an important point and one I wish I had communicated better.
A better understanding of the facts on my part and a couple of deep breaths at the outset would have prevented this situation. Having said all that, barring a miracle comeback from the Phillies I would like to see the Nats win a world series even if it comes after my apology
"I understand completely, Wynbish. It is hard for folks like you to realize that you've been wrong all these years. But, do not dwell on the past; look to the FUTURE!"
Okay then. We've been lied to. Obama didn't do everything he promised.
But instead of harping 'coulda woulda shoulda', could you please explain why Romney should be president?
Or do you just want to sit and whine about things you can't control?
"TheatreDiva90016 - another good reason to frequent these boards less."<<>>
“I hesitate to give this line of discussion the validation it so desperately craves by perpetuating it, but the light from logic is getting further and further away with your every successive post.” <<>>
-whatever2
Why do I want Romney to be President? Let's see. There are TWO people running for President in 2012. One of them is a KNOWN failure and the other is a known SUCCESS.
Only one of them has been president, and he's been doing just fine, by me.
Thanks for a wonderful debate.
"TheatreDiva90016 - another good reason to frequent these boards less."<<>>
“I hesitate to give this line of discussion the validation it so desperately craves by perpetuating it, but the light from logic is getting further and further away with your every successive post.” <<>>
-whatever2
His stimulus package was supposed to keep the unemployment rate below 8%. It has been ABOVE 8% (even reaching 10%) since the stimulus was passed. FAIL! "Shovel Ready Jobs": FAIL! Brought the economic recovery to a screeching halt. FAIL By 2012 unemployment rate will be below 6%. FAIL He was going to cut the deficit in half by the end of his first term. Instead it has almost DOUBLED. FAIL! President Obama's 2012 budget: Senate 99 to 0. House: 414 to 0. Even Democrats did not vote to support his budget. FAIL! Close Gitmo. FAIL! Gas prices have a new "norm": $3.50. FAIL (Though this might be deemed a success since he promised that energy prices would "necessarily skyrocket" under his plan.) $500 million to Solyndra. FAIL $100 million to Ener1: FAIL Attorney General Eric Holder: MAJOR FAIL!! USA loses its triple A credit rating (the first President in history to preside over a credit rating drop): FAIL Gowth in GDP in 2012: Q1: 2% Q2 (relesed on Friday): 1.5% FAIL U.S. poverty rate is expected to be 15.7% by October, highest rate since 1965. FAIL
"he's been doing just fine, by me." You must have EXTREMELY low standards!
You say he brought the economic recovery to a halt. It's more accurate to say he brought the economic meltdown started by the previous administration to a halt. But hey...at least you admit he started the economic recovery. That's a step in the right direction.