Michael J Fox: Be Healed- Page 7

[JustAGuy]

Posted: 10/30/06 at 12:43pm

"While you may think it is a yawn, and while your bible the NY Times will not print it, the rest of the country knows of the growing scandal."

Have any proof of that...or is this just another one of your wishful thinking accusations?

[Dakin]

Posted: 10/30/06 at 12:45pm

It' s Karl Rove's October surprise!

Isn't it great!

[JustAGuy]

Posted: 10/30/06 at 12:50pm

"He was on camera while over-medicated. Do you deny that?

Do you agree that he never read the bill endorsed by that loon that he is working for?"

Why do you always answer a question with a question.?

The question isn't if he was over-medicated. He himself has admitted that the drugs kicked in harder than he expected.

The question has always been if he did it on purpose. You accused him of over-medicating on purpose. All I want is proof of your accusation. If you have it then share it with the rest of us.

He also has admitted that he hasn't read the text of the bill. He did that yesterday in the ABC interview. But, his TV ad was not endorsing the bill, he was endorsing McCaskill who supports the research.

Now, that I've answered your questions, why don't you answer mine? Where's the proof that he PURPOSELY over-medicated himself?

Be a man...answer the question.

[Dakin]

Posted: 10/30/06 at 1:01pm

The proof is in the fact that he allowed himself to go on camera while knowingly being over-medicated.

He pulled the stunt for maximum impact. He knew what he was doing.

[JustAGuy]

Posted: 10/30/06 at 1:07pm

That's not proof, sorry, that's your suppostion.

Proof would be that he admitted that he purposely over-medicated for effect. Since he's never admitted to that and you having nothing to offer but your un-supported theory to back up your statements, then I have to assume you actually have NO PROOF.

Is that the fact...do you have no proof? A simple yes or no will suffice.

[Dakin]

Posted: 10/30/06 at 1:18pm

YES THERE IS PROOF.

you have it.
Updated On: 10/30/06 at 01:18 PM

[Lavieboheme3090]

Posted: 10/30/06 at 1:20pm

Where is the proof, did you give him his meds that morning?

[Dakin]

Posted: 10/30/06 at 1:20pm

No he over-medicated himself.

[Lavieboheme3090]

Posted: 10/30/06 at 1:23pm

Did you got to med school, give him the prescription, and then keep careful track of exactly what he was taking?

[JustAGuy]

Posted: 10/30/06 at 1:26pm

"YES THERE IS PROOF.

you have it."


Do tell? And where might that truth be? Please point us in the right direction so that we can be as enlightened as you.

Updated On: 10/30/06 at 01:26 PM

[DG]

Posted: 10/30/06 at 1:33pm

Dakin's issue seems to be that Mr. Fox went ahead and filmed the commercial, even though he knew he was having a visible reaction to the meds because of his disease - as if showing the negative aspects of it wasn't the entire point.

There's a reason that Mr. Fox was doing the commercial, as opposed to a non-sufferer. And showing the world the effect was precisely the point. Anyone who has a problem with that simply doesn't want to be reminded that people ARE suffering.

And anyone who has an issue with the suffering being used to make a point doesn't understand marketing at all - and certainly has never seen a Republican ad.

[JustAGuy]

Posted: 10/30/06 at 1:38pm

Dakin has many issues, that's obvious to all of us. He particularly has one with the truth and finding facts that support his claims.

Posted: 10/30/06 at 1:59pm

bakin is just as good at remote-diagnosis as bill frist..

[Dakin]

Posted: 10/30/06 at 2:12pm

Talent will win Missouri as a result of the disingenious ad.

Did you see all the celebrities that came out against McGaskil?

she has problems. Maybe she and Neddy can go for a drink on November 8.

[JustAGuy]

Posted: 10/30/06 at 2:14pm

Back to the point Dakin, where's the proof?

[Dakin]

Posted: 10/30/06 at 2:19pm

What will evryone think if Talent wins.

And you have the proof, he did the ad over-medicated-it was his intention to have the ad shown with he himself over-medicated.

[JustAGuy]

Posted: 10/30/06 at 2:22pm

"And you have the proof, he did the ad over-medicated-it was his intention to have the ad shown with he himself over-medicated."

Again, that's your supposition. You really need to learn the difference between your wishful thinking, and the truth.

Show me where Fox said that it was his intention to have the ad shown with himself over-medicated. That would be the truth, otherwise, it's just another one of your un-supported theories.

[Dakin]

Posted: 10/30/06 at 2:36pm

He let the ad be shown. He could have re-done it. He wanted it on in that format.

Ring ring, playdough.

[Lavieboheme3090]

Posted: 10/30/06 at 2:44pm

That still doesn't prove that he took more meds than he should have that day.

[JustAGuy]

Posted: 10/30/06 at 2:54pm

News Flash...Michael J. Fox has Parkinson's Disease. Michael J. Fox suffers from the effects of Parkinson's Disease. Michael J. Fox made an ad supporting a candidate who supports Stem Cell Research which may or may not lead to a cure for Parkinson's Disease. Michael J. Fox took his medication for Parkinson's Disease, which he admits kicked in harder than he thought it would. Michael J. Fox filmed the ad while suffering from these effects. Effects which possible or probably occur on a fairly regular frequency in his life. Michael J. Fox opted to film the commercial while suffering these effects. Why he chose to make the ad while suffering from these effects was explained in his ABC interview:

"Fox: … Because you have, without it at this point, this way: If I didn't medicate it at all, I'd have a masked face, I'd have very limited movement, I'd have a very difficult time speaking, a la Mohammed Ali or similar. So if I want to be articulate, if I want to speak, this comes with the package. So—

Stephanopoulos: That's the tradeoff.

Fox: That's the tradeoff.

So I either sound good or look good.

(LAUGHTER)

I don't get the whole package.

You know, it's a constant balancing act, and there are things to go with it. Sitting still in a chair and being involved in an interrogatory, no matter how friendly or unfriendly or whatever, just the stress that it takes to be focused and to get the words together, you know, increases the motion.

It's just something to get used to. The thing that's strange about it is when you're live with it every day, and then to have someone outside give you a review on it."

However, no where has Michael J. Fox admitted to PURPOSELY over-medicating to produce these effects. It's a fact of his life that they happen to him.

Now, once again Dakin, I ask for proof from you that Fox over-medicated on purpose to produce these effects. Until you can do that your arguments are nothing more than fluff.

Updated On: 10/30/06 at 02:54 PM

[Dakin]

Posted: 10/30/06 at 10:21pm

The scandal is growing as MJ Fox is being exposed as a phony on the issues.

Thanks Michael for bringing out droves of conservatives who might have stayed at home.

[ShbrtAlley44]

Posted: 10/30/06 at 10:27pm

Sorry?

[kjklo]

Posted: 10/30/06 at 10:39pm

The medical symptoms of Michael J Fox, or anyone else for that matter, have nothing whatsoever to do with the ethical dilemma of embryonic stem cell research. Whether one believes that such research is a morally neutral scientific option or a purposeful destruction of human life that cannot be publicly supported is a problem completely separate from this whole discussion.

I can't imagine that a conservative voter genuinely concerned about stem cell research would choose not to vote, but then change his mind based on a celebrity commercial.

[Dakin]

Posted: 10/30/06 at 10:50pm

If that's so, why he is out there using his disease as a defense for a bill that he hasn't even read.

MJ Fox is a FRAUD. How embarrassing for the dems and for him.

[FindingNamo]

Posted: 10/30/06 at 10:53pm

He endorsed a candidate, retard. His right as an American, at least right now.