Skip to main content
Shop Merch Add a Show Listing
My Shows
News on your favorite shows, specials & more!
#151

PROP 8 OVERTURNED

I just wonder if the Concerned Women of America (and similar harpies of hate) are so concerned about redefining words, why haven't they come after Facebook? "Friend" wasn't a verb until Facebook came on the scene, but people aren't up in arms about that.
#152

PROP 8 OVERTURNED

LOL! This is just adorable!

Christians Respond: "We Live in a Secular Dictatorship"

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gZnVlD5y7_Y&feature=
'There are three sides to every story. My side, your side, and the truth. And no one is lying. Memories shared serve each one differently' -Robert Evans-
#153

PROP 8 OVERTURNED

"Concerned Women of America" - what a crock of sh*t!!
Hey Dottie! Did your colleagues enjoy the cake even though your cat decided to sit on it? ~GuyfromGermany
#154

PROP 8 OVERTURNED

That Chris Matthews interview (as well as the judge's ruling itself) just proves that there is no basis behind any of this except to discriminate against gay people.
#155

PROP 8 OVERTURNED

I just received this message from the Courage Campaign which helped fund the defense against Prop 8.

The American Family Association, part of the coalition of right-wing religious groups that spearheaded Proposition 8 in 2008, is asking its 2.3 million supporters to pressure Congress to impeach Judge Vaughn Walker.

Shockingly, AFA is using Judge Walker's sexual orientation to attack him as a "black-robed tyrant whose own lifestyle choices make it impossible to believe he could be impartial." Like the National Organization for Marriage, the AFA is rallying religious extremists to build a national backlash against Judge Walker's historic ruling striking down Prop 8.

These particular bat-sh*t crazy douche bags are not satisfied unless they have someone to hate.
Hey Dottie! Did your colleagues enjoy the cake even though your cat decided to sit on it? ~GuyfromGermany
#156

PROP 8 OVERTURNED

I love the notion that because he's gay he shouldn't have been to one trying this.
#157

PROP 8 OVERTURNED

Again...it shows that they have no logic except hatred and homophobia. Using that logic a straight jude would be biased too if he ruled in favor of Prop 8. Thinking like that the only judge qualified to preside over the case would be a eunich.
#158

PROP 8 OVERTURNED

"black-robed tyrant whose own lifestyle choices make it impossible to believe he could be impartial"

They shouldn' ought to talk about Clarence Thomas that way.
#159

PROP 8 OVERTURNED

Let them keep spouting this crap and exposing how ignorant and scared they are.

From the NY Times.

“Since those days, several published reports have stated that the judge is himself gay. In February, The San Francisco Chronicle called it an “open secret.” Critics have argued that his sexual orientation was a source of bias that should have disqualified him from hearing the Proposition 8 case. Judge Walker has declined to discuss the matter.

Monroe H. Freedman, an expert in legal ethics at Hofstra Law School, said that while bias could lead to recusal in rare cases, “you could say, ‘If a gay judge is disqualified, how about a straight judge?’ There isn’t anybody about whom somebody might say, ‘You’re not truly impartial in this case.’ ”

Mr. Freedman cited a 1975 opinion by Judge Constance Baker Motley of Federal District Court, an African-American jurist who was asked to disqualify herself from a lawsuit alleging unlawful discrimination. “If background or sex or race of each judge were, by definition, sufficient grounds for removal, no judge on this court could hear this case, or many others,” she wrote.

Stephen Gillers, a professor at New York University Law School, said the time to raise such a challenge to Judge Vaughn had passed: if an issue is not brought up at trial, it is considered waived. “You can’t wait to see how a judge will rule and then say he’s the wrong judge,” Mr. Gillers said. “

http://www.nytimes.com/2010/08/06/us/06walker.html?_r=1&ref=us


Finish each day and be done with it. You have done what you could. Some blunders and absurdities no doubt crept in; forget them as soon as you can. Tomorrow is a new day; begin it well and serenely and with too high a spirit to be enbered with your old nonsense. ~ Emerson
#160

PROP 8 OVERTURNED

I know facts are irrelevant to some, but Walker was originally nominated to the Federal bench in 1987 by Reagan. His nomination stalled due to backlash from Walker representing the US Olympic Committee in their suit to stop the Gay Olympics from using the word 'Olympics' (hence, the current 'Gay Games'). Dems considered him too insensitive to gay rights to sit on the bench.
"It does me no injury for my neighbour to say there are 20 gods or no god. It neither picks my pocket, nor breaks my leg." -- Thomas Jefferson
#161

PROP 8 OVERTURNED

Oh, you're so very right. Without the democratic party, we would all be in hell on earth. Thank God that they tried to stop his nomination.
#162

PROP 8 OVERTURNED



PROP 8 OVERTURNED
'There are three sides to every story. My side, your side, and the truth. And no one is lying. Memories shared serve each one differently' -Robert Evans-

Updated On: 8/6/10 at 02:57 PM

#163

PROP 8 OVERTURNED




'There are three sides to every story. My side, your side, and the truth. And no one is lying. Memories shared serve each one differently' -Robert Evans-

Updated On: 8/6/10 at 02:58 PM

#165

PROP 8 OVERTURNED

Just curious - what happens if the Supreme Court so-called "splits the baby" (which some commentators think Kennedy will do).

He says it is unconstitutional to deny gay unions all of the same rights and benefits of straight unions, but reserves the use of the word "marriage" for religious ceremonies.

So, everyone gets the same exact rights (including federal and state benefits)when a civil wedding is performed, but the word "marriage" is still reserved to straight couples who have a religious ceremony.

I know the word "marriage" is important - but is it really the word, or the rights, that are at issue here.

Just curious.

#166

PROP 8 OVERTURNED

I think that's fine, as long as "marriage" is simply a religious ceremony. It should then confer no more rights than a baptism or christening--have one or don't, but you have no rights or privileges till you stand in line with the gays down at City Hall.

Let's see how many "marriage preservationists" will get on board with that.
#167

PROP 8 OVERTURNED

Honestly, I don't see that as a realistic outcome. Walker was very clear and thorough in his decision, pointing out the inherent inequity by denying MARRIAGE. It's not (just) about rights, it's about equality. Plus, five votes are needed, so it's not entirely just about Kennedy. I can't see the liberal justices going for what you describe. Plus, Kennedy is very concerned about his legacy, and he has written two previous major decisions regarding gay rights. I don't see him hesitating about a third.
"It does me no injury for my neighbour to say there are 20 gods or no god. It neither picks my pocket, nor breaks my leg." -- Thomas Jefferson
#168

PROP 8 OVERTURNED

I wasn't really talking about a valid legal decision. I was more fantasizing about saying to all the protect-traditional-marriage folks, "Fine. You win. Marriage goes back into the church and has no validity outside of it."

I imagine it would instantly make it abundantly clear how it's about power, and not about tradition or anything else they pretend.
#169

PROP 8 OVERTURNED

Here would be my 'compromise': marriage is civil, and available to all, equally. Churches can then come up with their own new word(s) for the religious aspect.
"It does me no injury for my neighbour to say there are 20 gods or no god. It neither picks my pocket, nor breaks my leg." -- Thomas Jefferson
#170

PROP 8 OVERTURNED

That's fine, too.

Or everyone who opposes marriage equality can just go f*ck themselves. That's probably simplest.
#171

PROP 8 OVERTURNED

MB - I hope you are right.

Kennedy is one jurist, but the Perry Opinion seemed to be specifically written for him.

Here is the discussion. I am not sure if I agree with it, but it is worth reading.

Further Thoughts on Perry
#172

PROP 8 OVERTURNED

YWIW, before I started following the Prop 8 trial and reading the blogged transcripts everyday, I was one of the people that said, “I really don’t care what you call it as long as you give me my rights. The same rights as everyone else. After all, it’s just a word.”

Now, I realize that it’s much more than a word. If I have to settle for a civil union or civil partnership, my commitment to the person I love is never going to be treated equally or given the same value, in society, as the commitments of people who are allowed to marry.

My union will be treated as less important and less meaningful. If they're truly the same, then why do they need different names?

Edit: And that last question wasn't specifically aimed at you, YWIW. PROP 8 OVERTURNED

Finish each day and be done with it. You have done what you could. Some blunders and absurdities no doubt crept in; forget them as soon as you can. Tomorrow is a new day; begin it well and serenely and with too high a spirit to be enbered with your old nonsense. ~ Emerson

Updated On: 8/6/10 at 03:43 PM

#173

PROP 8 OVERTURNED

"Or everyone who opposes marriage equality can just go f*ck themselves. That's probably simplest."

I'm with Reg. Will you "civil union" me, Reg? PROP 8 OVERTURNED
Cheyenne Jackson tickled me. AFTER ordering SoMMS a drink but NOT tickling him, and hanging out with Girly in his dressing room (where he DIDN'T tickle her) but BEFORE we got married. To others. And then he tweeted Boobs. He also tweeted he's good friends with some chick on "The Voice" who just happens to be good friends with Tink's ex. And I'm still married. Oh, and this just in: "Pettiness, spite, malice ....Such ugly emotions... So sad." - After Eight, talking about MEEEEEEEE!!! I'm so honored! :-)
#174

PROP 8 OVERTURNED

Shameless, I completely get that.

I am playing a bit of devil's advocate here.

But, I could see a scenario that when you get a license, it is a license for a civil union - which confers the same rights to all couples, gay or straight. When you enter into a civil union, you receive the rights and benefits that we had traditionally associate with a marriage and marriage license.

If your house of worship wants to bless the ceremony, that is up to you and your religion. But, by taking the religious component out of the discussion, I think it becomes far more black and white.

Ideally, marriage is marriage, gay or straight. But, I think there is a case to distinguish between the religious ceremony of marriage, and the civil act of recognizing the union.
#175

PROP 8 OVERTURNED

Also, unless I'm crazy, can't "marriage" also mean the joining of ANY two things? "The marriage of peanut butter and jelly revolutionized brown bag lunches" or whatever.

BroadwayWorld TV


Ticket Central
Hot Show
Tickets From $58
Hot Show
Tickets From $71
Hot Show
Tickets From $71
Hot Show
Tickets From $71