BEAUTIFUL: The Carole King Musical preview thread — Page 3
Posted: 11/25/13 at 2:25pm
I forgot to mention Jake Epstein earlier too -- I really liked him in Spring Awakening, and I kinda liked him in Beautiful in SF, but I was back to the "really" this go around. I thought he talk-sang through a lot of SA, which was weird, so it was nice to hear him sing in this. I think he may have more to sing in the show now than he did before.
Agreed with Kelly about Up on the Roof. We already know what the Drifters sounded like singing it (and they already have On Broadway) -- let's let just Gerry sing it!
Posted: 11/25/13 at 8:12pm
Posted: 11/25/13 at 10:28pm
True! I read an article, stating that a lot of the "drama" per say, was left out of the musical because it was material the creators were NOT allowed to use in the show. King gave her approval, but apparently it came with conditions (you can't say this, or talk about this, etc). So, for what the creators HAD to work with may be the best results they could do!
Posted: 11/25/13 at 10:52pm
Updated On: 11/25/13 at 10:52 PM
Posted: 11/25/13 at 11:56pm
I get that. But the only other times I said that was:
Christian Borale - starcatcher
Billy porter-kinky boots
Im 2 for 2.
Haha.... I never walk out insisting someone will win something, that's all. But, yes the season has just begun and it's a great one!
Posted: 11/26/13 at 2:04pm
I think it is very fascinating how a show get puts together to become the final product the audience sees. The challenges are very difficult to pull something off like this. The Richard Ridge interview shows Carole's daughter answering questions from Richard that really give you the tone of the piece and what her mother wanted it to be. You can tell there was some things left out of the play, and it shows in her answers!
Here's the Richard Ridge Interview:
https://www.broadwayworld.com/article/BWW-TV-Meet-the-Cast-of-Broadways-BEAUTIFUL--Plus-an-Onstage-Performance-Preview-20131122
Updated On: 11/26/13 at 02:04 PM
Posted: 11/26/13 at 2:09pm
A musical that goes into the gritty details of Gerry's drug abuse and mental illness and all would be a very, very different show in tone than this one is. I don't think that's the story they're trying to tell. A lot of the other hardships in Carole's life mentioned earlier in the thread fall well outside the time frame this show is examining. I mean, I'd love to know a lot more about the darker side of her story, before and after Tapestry, but I don't think most of that has a place in this show, and not because of censorship. Does that make sense?
Posted: 11/26/13 at 2:13pm
Posted: 11/26/13 at 2:22pm
Posted: 11/26/13 at 3:24pm
Updated On: 11/26/13 at 03:24 PM
Posted: 11/29/13 at 12:20pm
But I'll be damned if I wasn't entertained. The songs are impeccably performed, the design is wonderful, there are fun quick changes, and the voices of the cast are fantastic.
And, of course, Jessie Mueller. Enough cannot be said for how excellent she is. She truly transcends the material, and when she is able to let loose, the excitement is palpable. I would happily see her win the Tony for this.
Updated On: 11/29/13 at 12:20 PM
Posted: 11/29/13 at 4:38pm
Posted: 11/29/13 at 5:32pm
Act 2 is very much a new work in progress - tons of new dialogue to make it more about the making/origin of Tapestry - but frankly some of these new scenes need some rehearsing - slow, and awkward (i.e. intro into Natural Woman, intro into It's Too Late, very looong intro into You've Got a Friend). All these new dialogue make Gerry's character practically gone for all of act 2. I am excited that they are continuing to tweak at this.
Posted: 12/8/13 at 6:11pm
I was very happy to see the major rewriting done to Carole's final scene with Gerry back when I saw it. *SPOILER* It just flows so much better without the attempt on his part to get back together and the "YOU'RE going all the way" really worked for me.
Posted: 12/8/13 at 8:06pm
The book is not fantastic, but workable and combined with the performances made for a really great evening. Did I mention Jessie Mueller was incredible?
I didn't have a huge interest in this and was very happily surprised. Oh, by the way, Jessie Mueller was incredible.
Posted: 12/9/13 at 2:25pm
Posted: 12/9/13 at 3:15pm
Sorry! I just saw this. Besides acting myself, I also do work as an acting coach here in NYC. A client that I've worked with was called in for an ensemble role that would have covered (understudied) the role of Carole. At that point, they were also wanting that track to cover the role of Cynthia, so I had to help her prepare both roles with the material from the script.
Posted: 12/9/13 at 3:52pm
Posted: 12/9/13 at 4:09pm
Posted: 12/9/13 at 5:01pm
Posted: 12/12/13 at 11:27pm
Posted: 12/15/13 at 5:45pm
There's some magic that goes on. All the main characters get nicely humanized and are endearing even with a clunky book. My guess is that Anika Larsen has a great shot a Tony too.
This show is gonna be a big fat hit. The older audiences (the ones with the $$$ to spend) will flock to this and this show will tour like a dream.
I was swept away for two hours. Jessie nails it and its a tour de force.
Posted: 12/21/13 at 9:47pm
I agree with a recent post- it avoided things that Motown and Baby Its You did.
I thought it was stronger than Memphis which I also liked.
Ironically, Baby its You could not secure the rights for Will You Still Love Me Tomorrow which is absurd given it was their biggest hit.
What I liked about this show was there were some additional subplots that gave the other cast members a lot of time.
I sat in the front row for this which was actually pretty good since the pit took a few feet and most of the show takes part in the front half of the stage.
Was the most I ever paid for a broadway show (normal face) and was well worth it.
Perhaps they worked on the book more? I found it rather smooth unlike the choppy Motown one.
Question (as a piano player myself)- is she playing on any of the songs? (looked like she was doing some of the Bach) or is it merely the pit musicians- saw they had a few keyboardists/pianists.
I agree with a previous post that a little more could have been done with the Carnegie Hall Concert- was actually listening to that on my ride up today.
Posted: 12/22/13 at 12:08am
To answer your question, Mick Seven, I saw the show from above and she is not actually playing the piano. But she did a hell of a job acting like she did. I was so convinced that I had to look at the conductor a few times to see if he was playing or not. The only time he did not play along is when she played the classical bit for Gerry at college.
BroadwayWorld TV