Sad about Sound Design but sort of bittersweet that revival authors and composers will receive awards in the future. Well, for one year, at least. The Tonys change their minds A LOT.
I have to admit: I don't know enough ABOUT sound design as a category to know if this makes sense or not but Hooray for the consideration of the creators of a piece not previously eligible is great.
Well that's a giant slap in the face to the sound designers. They are eligible for the Outer Critics and Drama Desk Awards, so why shouldn't they be eligible for the Tonys? They just added the category in 2008, so it's not even that old to begin with. Dumb dumb dumb.
Why are they eliminating the Sound Design categories? Why not just add brand new categories for Make-Up Design instead?
While I completely disagree with it, I'm not the bit surprised by this omission. As an (amateur) sound designer myself, it seems that nobody understands what goes into a sound designer's work; sound design is black and white for the general public - it's either good or bad, there's never an in between. It's a shame that these hardworking theater folks will now lose their acknowledgement.
Updated On: 6/11/14 at 06:25 PM
Lighting is in but sound isn't. I don't know
Enough about either but it seems that if you can't see it, it doesn't count?
Sound design is something I pay attention to. I know a few sound designers and have an interest in it. It is a big slap in the face. I think it is a very important part of the show.
While I believe Sound Design absolutely deserves recognition at the Tony's, I'm personally baffled when I try to evaluate the best sounding productions each year for my own personal little rankings. As a layman, I can absolutely tell you when Sound Design is awful for a show, but at a certain point once it's good it's indistinguishable from great and shades within. So here's my quandary: if the intention of ending these categories is that the general population of Tony voters is unqualified to evaluate Sound Design at a proficient level, why can't the Tonys consider creating a small jury of professionals to vote as qualified evaluators? (Of course, this leads to greater corruption - hello, the Documentary and Sound/Song wings at the Oscars...)
I'm very sorry for my SD friends and all the SDs out there, but I do wonder if this isn't a little related to general sense I have that most voters are hopeless at evaluating Sound Design. It's not unlike (to use a sports metaphor that's bound to go over like gangbusters on a Broadway forum) an offensive line in football: you only notice them if they're not doing their job well. At least that's how I perceive the art of sound design as a layman...
Can someone clarify the new rule around authors for me? The wording confuses me.
Thrilled for the new rule regarding "classics." We would have seen Stephen Sondheim, Larry Kramer, John Cameron Mitchell, Stephen Trask, etc. win Tony Awards for their work. Wish it were implicated sooner.
Eliminating the sound design categories is extremely awful. I can't even collect my thoughts about it, it's just so wrong.
Basically since the creators of shows like Hedwig and Violet were not eligible for Best Book or Best Score since those shows were deemed revivals, they would win Tonys if the show wins Best Revival. Normally the Best Revival Tony only goes to the producer. Now it will go to the show creators if the show has never appeared on Broadway before but is deemed a revival.
Stand-by Joined: 5/26/14
I was just about to type the same thing! It's too bad it wasn't in time for Violet and Hedwig. But their being left out this year--even though the creators could not have been up for Tonys the first time around--is probably the precise reason the rule has been changed.
Oh I see. Thank you for explaining it. I think that's a good way to honor the authors.
So here's my question: If Assassins, or The Normal Heart or Violet or Hedwig were to be revived AGAIN in another production in years to come, do you they think this rule might apply to them since the rule wasn't in effect for their first revival?
Updated On: 6/11/14 at 07:18 PM
The way it's worded, no. It says "not previously produced on Broadway" and at this point all of those shows have been.
Well, when NPH talks, people listen!
Chorus Member Joined: 3/13/14
As someone who works with a number of sound designers, I have a couple of thoughts. First off, most lay people couldn't tell you whether the lighting design of a show was good, bad, or indifferent -- if they can see, great. Same thing with sound. These are disciplines that are very technical and the average person isn't going to notice how tight a lighting plot the designer used so that the light is very discrete rather than having big washes of color. Similarly, they aren't going to notice how well the sound system was timed so that it sounds like it's all coming from the stage rather than the speakers. Now sound design, like lighting design doesn't happen in a vacuum. Directors and producers often have a say in what the designers do. These days because of home surround systems shows are becoming louder, less natural, less clear, and more of a sonic assault. The better designers, including this year's Tony winners Brian Ronan and Steve Canyon Kennedy, have done shows that have forward presentations and ones that were more subtle. They work very hard to balance the needs of the show, the cast and the audience, all the while trying their best to make the sound system disappear. Without sound designers, mixers and A2's (the sound person backstage responsible for getting the mics on the actors and all the backstage sound gear) the very shows the League lauds would simply not be possible. Shows would simply be blocked so that all actors spoke downstage. Mics allow actors the freedom to face anywhere on the stage and speak or sing and be heard. Many Broadway performers would simply not be able to perform without mics because so many lack the kind of vocal training to hit the back of the house without a mic the way most British actors can.
It is a huge slap in the face of many in the industry to have Sound Design not recognized.
If you'd like to show your support, please sign the petition.
Reinstate the Tony Award for Sound Design
Seeing how the Tonys sound often sucks, it makes sense they are getting rid of Sound Design. They know nothing about it.
Chorus Member Joined: 3/13/14
That is televised sound, not Broadway sound. And it's a live broadcast that has its own set of problems. Broadway designers have nothing to do with it.
Amen, betty.
Isn't the sound designer tasked with finding sound effects too, such as an aircraft taking off or church bells ringing?
Lost In Translation, I wasnt insulting the Broadway sound designers. I know they have nothing to do with it. The people associated with the Tonys are morons.
Do you think there will be some kind of protest to this? I remember when the drama desks left off orchestrations, JRB got really mad and made a petition and stuff. I know sound design less understood by the public than orchestrations are, but I still wouldn't be surprised if some Broadway sound designers spoke out against this in some way.
A petition has already been started:
http://www.thepetitionsite.com/470/217/554/reinstate-the-tony-award-categories-for-sound-design-now/#next_action
Broadway Star Joined: 11/9/10
If they are going to change the rules, then I think any show (musical or play) that has NOT played Broadway before should ONLY be considered as a new piece. I really don't care if it's played the rounds at your local theater and or colleges and or it's very popular. If it hasn't played a Broadway house and the Tony committee is judging the qualifications based on what is on Broadway, then it should not be considered a revival. Violet played an Off-Broadway house 17 years ago...now it's on Broadway and considered a revival? Sorry, don't think so!
Videos