Broadway has a big logo problem. When you only have 3 agencies, everything starts to look the same.
That said, it's 2025, and people are drawn to seeing people, and advertising must work across all sorts of platforms. If you have a star, it helps to reinforce the name with the face. Hand-drawn logos were a necessity in an age when shows were doing print advertising and a lot of it would appear in b&w. Also: one cannot criticize this industry's changes without examining how ALL products are advertised now vs 10, 25, 50+ years ago.
I find the photo-based key art for GN&GL and John Proctor to be both artful and an effective sales tool.
What's NOT attractive is advertising via headshots (Glengarry, Our Town), or overly busy photo art (Smash, DBH, MHE), or whatever the hell Gypsy is doing. But some of those shows have still sold decently well –– better than shows like Last Ship and Swept Away that had gorgeous, painterly art.
Long-running musicals benefit from evergreen artwork that can be replicated regardless of who is in the show. Hamilton, Wicked, Mamma Mia, Lion King, CamMack's big shows, etc...there's real iconography. But a lot of shows nowadays would be thrilled to surpass one year. DBH probably thinks "if we're lucky to last beyond Megan & Jen's contracts, we'll figure the art pivot out at that time."
Updated On: 3/23/25 at 01:06 AM