CRITICS RAVAGE BROADWAY AUDIENCES — Page 3
Posted: 7/2/14 at 12:54pm
Do you really think disruptive people are doing what they do from a wish to harm others? No - they're doing what they think is the right thing to do at that moment. And yet their actions still have negative repercussions, don't they?
Someone who takes out his phone and texts during a show might be trying to find out if his sister's baby was born yet - a joyful motivation, but still disruptive to those around him.
What matters in our relations within the group is less the motivation than the effect it has. I'm dancing for joy, but I'm stepping on your toes. Which is more important?
Updated On: 7/2/14 at 12:54 PM
Posted: 7/2/14 at 1:01pm
Posted: 7/2/14 at 1:04pm
Posted: 7/2/14 at 1:05pm
You aren't bothered by someone standing during the show, but you are bothered by talking or food. But you have to admit (or should admit) that there are distractions that bother others as much as your list does you, right?
You wouldn't say that it's only valid to object to the things you personally find objectionable, would you?
Updated On: 7/2/14 at 01:05 PM
Posted: 7/2/14 at 1:09pm
And also.. sorry.. but Talking, eating, and cell phone usage, candy wrappers, .. are in NO way part of what should be the theater going experience. Those are just wrong.
Posted: 7/2/14 at 1:10pm
It's a cultural thing and there's really nothing that can be done about it at this point.
Updated On: 7/2/14 at 01:10 PM
Posted: 7/2/14 at 1:11pm
BINGO.
Posted: 7/2/14 at 1:18pm
When it's the same thing, two sides of the same action, both aspects should be acknowledged - the good and the bad. You accuse me of considering "giving a honest and genuine ovation at a show.. wrong." Wrong. I consider blocking someone's view wrong.
And I believe that the standing happened during the song; it wasn't quite what we'd call an ovation, is it? That's for the end.
And Namo - you've said a mouthful there.
Updated On: 7/2/14 at 01:18 PM
Posted: 7/2/14 at 1:20pm
Posted: 7/2/14 at 1:21pm
I had to use the restroom before the end of the act and decided to sit in some of the empty seats in the back. My friend came up and said, "I should have let you yell at them. The minute you got up and left, the husband pulled his phone out and started texting"
I would have lost it, and he would have lost his arm.
Good thing I had a cocktail before hand.
Posted: 7/2/14 at 1:22pm
You see, you're just not acknowledging the point I'm making - you appear to believe that your list of bad behavior is the only real list of bad behavior, and that what others may object to is just "a tad much."
Which is exactly how the eaters, talkers, and texters feel.
Updated On: 7/2/14 at 01:22 PM
Posted: 7/2/14 at 1:24pm
Diva.. I got into it with a texter at the Pnatages. House gave me a comp for a future show. You have to speak up for yourself. A loud " Shut the F up! - works wonders.
Updated On: 7/2/14 at 01:24 PM
Posted: 7/2/14 at 1:26pm
Posted: 7/2/14 at 1:34pm
THE HORROR! I hope you slapped them.
Posted: 7/2/14 at 1:42pm
Posted: 7/2/14 at 1:48pm
Although I don't personally care much for standing ovations at the end of a song, it doesn't particularly bother me. What was being discussed here was one person standing up in the middle of a song.
"Mortified?" You feel embarrassed or foolish by me?
Updated On: 7/2/14 at 01:48 PM
Posted: 7/2/14 at 1:53pm
Doesn't sound like anyone had a problem with it. In this case the audience response enriched the show. Someone standing in the middle of a number.. sure.. that sucks. But that is not what happened here. It was something different. Anyway.. done with going tit for tat with you.
Posted: 7/2/14 at 1:54pm
Posted: 7/2/14 at 1:55pm
YES!
Posted: 7/2/14 at 2:09pm
Posted: 7/2/14 at 2:16pm
Posted: 7/2/14 at 2:32pm
Posted: 7/2/14 at 2:45pm
Updated On: 7/2/14 at 02:45 PM
Posted: 7/2/14 at 2:47pm
The texting, eating, talking, etc fall into a different category because these are all things that distract the audience member and those around him or her from the proceedings onstage.
BroadwayWorld TV