The Distinctive Baritone said: "Interesting that when it was in development in 2019/2020 it was "all female." Now it's "all female, non-binary, and trans." Nothing wrong with that, but it does sort of point out how this production is essentially trying to be the "woke" version of a very white and male musical from the 1960's, which feels - to me anyway - a little gimmicky. Three years ago, in the middle of theHamiltoncraze and Trumpism, this production seemed like a cool, radical idea that gave a middle finger to the status quo. Now that this sort of casting isthe status quo to a certain degree, the productionstrikes me as a bit tired and virtue signaling. I sense that the "moment" for this version has passed, but I wish them all the best."
SO many things to unpack here. First of all, the word "woke" really has been weaponized beyond recognition. If a production is trying to stay current with the society we're in, and dragging the industry forward with it to the 21st century, it doesn't automatically make it "woke" in any sense of the word, colloquial or original. You are seemingly using the word as a shorthand to insult anything intersectional and inclusive, which is absolutely how right-wing and right-wing adjacent people use it.
No one has seen the show yet, so you either don't know what virtue-signalling means, or just want to write-off a show because of a casting decision rooted in where we are in the society. In 2019, the language for non-binary casting wasn't even in the lexicon yet (at least in Broadway circles) with the exception of small flares here and there. Skepticism is very healthy and everyone should retain it, but dismissing a show when (as far as anyone not actually in the production team knows) it's actually doing what activists and performers have been begging big production houses to do. Sure, it would be great if a story rooted in stories of non-binary and trans people were told instead of putting up yet another revival of a classic material, but that doesn't mean there's no place to reinterpret old art with today's lens. That's what a good revival should do.
As for "the moment" has passed. Please do point out what about the moment feels dated to you. Because people aren't out there marching in the streets? Or is it because MSM is not consistently covering those protests? Or because the issues have been fixed? Roe v Wade is about to be overturned, and 25 new state laws have been introduced in the last MONTH alone specifically targetting transgender and non-binary people (source : https://freedomforallamericans.org/legislative-tracker/anti-transgender-legislation/). Moment seems very much here from my perspective, and it will likely be here for a long time if America stays on the trajectory it is in.
If anything, I'm glad this production is creating a platform for us to have these conversations so we can have a hard look at our own biases. Everyone wants progress, unless they see what progress would do to the things we have long cherished and loved. And then everyone's all "well now you have gone too far, do you own thing, don't take what's mine".
Caption: Every so often there was a rare moment of perfect balance when I soared above him.