MusicalFan, I meant that the lotto wasn't rigged to the extent people were implying. Yes cast members were winning, but there were still many tickets to go around. People were making it sound like nobody not involved with the show won at all. And I couldn't care less about the lotto going, I can afford normal tickets or the new student rush tickets. It doesn't make a difference for me.
Artscallion, I fail to see your point about "literacy" vs. "literally". I am well aware they are different words, and they have nothing to do with each other. However, when making an analogy it should be 100% applicable to the situation and as such, taken literally. I think maybe you misunderstood my point, but whatever. Out of curiosity, how old are you dear?
WestVillage, the analogy was not accurate because there was no "cheating" involved. Whatever was going on was completely within the fine print of the lotto rules. People just weren't happy about it. It wasn't cheating, it's just that people were unhappy about it. I understand that this upsets people, and I totally understand that. But by no means should people take it out on the girl who runs the lotto. Especially when every other lottery around Times Square does the exact same thing.
Yankee, honestly I don't think the producers give a damn about the bad publicity. They are a pretty abrupt bunch. Next time any of you are at the Schoenfeld, ask Roz, the girl who did the lotto and takes tickets, why they are stopping the lotto. She will tell you that it's because she was getting harassed by unhappy customers. It had nothing to do with the threat of bad press. If that were the issue, there would be no shows running in New York.
Updated On: 7/31/07 at 10:13 PM