You also reacted emotionally and so did the rest of the gang. They smelled blood and went on the attack. That is an emotional reaction. Trolling works on all sides.
What emotional reaction was dblue looking for? One of "Oh"? You got all bent out of shape, no one else.
If we're not having fun, then why are we doing it?
These are DISCUSSION boards, not mutual admiration boards. Discussion only occurs when we are willing to hear what others are thinking, regardless of whether it is alignment to our own thoughts.
"In a Broadway musical, Aiken is perfect—he can throw that cheesy, octave-spanning man-voice of his around all he wants and hit all those honky gospel notes. It sounds great! He can slowly, slowly raise his arms in the air as he holds a note for 45 minutes. He can make his corny, cartoony facial expressions, and onstage, they’re utterly appropriate. Also, musical theater takes place in a land only slightly more erotically charged than Smurf Village, so here Aiken’s suppressed, indeterminate sexuality seems logical, usual, male. And he doesn’t seem hick. Partly because the twang is replaced by an equally theatrical Cockney and partly because he’s in a funny show. (The theme of his big number is “You won’t succeed on Broadway if you don’t have any Jews.”) Every joke gets a roar. “When I’m up here onstage, I’ll be the idol of my age,” he sings, and the women go crazy. You can almost feel them sucked toward him by some unholy mix of maternal yearning and abject horniness."
I see one of Mikers' other personalities has posted in other threads about how some people think reviews should only be posted if they agree with them. How ironic.
Mikers, that is not a review from Joseph, which is obvious from the references to Broadway... and, well, from the entire review. I have no opinion on other shows he's done, because I haven't seen them.
To say nothing of the fact that "You can almost feel them sucked toward him by some unholy mix of maternal yearning and abject horniness" is hardly a glowing review.
Please copy and paste the part of my review where I said Clay does not have talent. You can't seem to pinpoint it. I'm sure that's not because it didn't happen...
You still haven't explained how I "chummed the water." No specific examples, and nothing to back up your statement. Your argument is weak and now you're just grasping at straws.
"Still attention seeking, dbue? Are you unhappy that the focus is not on you right now?"
Wow, Mikers!
Same goes double for you!
"TheatreDiva90016 - another good reason to frequent these boards less."<<>>
“I hesitate to give this line of discussion the validation it so desperately craves by perpetuating it, but the light from logic is getting further and further away with your every successive post.” <<>>
-whatever2