Clay Aiken as Joseph- Page 8

[TheatreDiva90016]

Posted: 8/5/13 at 3:01pm

Because Clay wasn't n it.

[Mikers]

Posted: 8/5/13 at 3:01pm

Mikers, I think you missed the part of Diva's comment where she said "everything."

That lets me off the hook then thanks.

[dblue236]

Posted: 8/5/13 at 3:02pm

Every day, I find another reason to believe you should have to pass an IQ test to use the internet.

[Mikers]

Posted: 8/5/13 at 3:02pm

Mikers, how come you did not post your review of Matilda ?

I don't post reviews ever. I find them attention seeking.

[Reginald Tresilian]

Posted: 8/5/13 at 3:02pm

"@Kad. You're the one hounding this topic. LMAO"

Seriously, Kad! Can you not talk about anything other than Clay Aiken???

[siny]

Posted: 8/5/13 at 3:03pm

Or maybe because Mikers did not really see Matilda. Because Clay is not in it.

[dblue236]

Posted: 8/5/13 at 3:03pm

If you find reviews attention seeking on a message board about theater, why do you post anything at all? Oh wait... because you're seeking attention.

[Reginald Tresilian]

Posted: 8/5/13 at 3:03pm

Then why read them?

[dblue236]

Posted: 8/5/13 at 3:04pm

"Then why read them?"

Also that.

[Mikers]

Posted: 8/5/13 at 3:05pm

How did this turn into all about me? Go find someone else to gang up on.

[Kad]

Posted: 8/5/13 at 3:06pm

YOU made it about you, you deluded dolt.

[TheatreDiva90016]

Posted: 8/5/13 at 3:07pm

All 6 of you? LMAO!!!!!!!!!!!!
You're harder to get rid of than bedbugs! LMAO
I'd call it well informed. Passionate even LMAO
@Kad. You're the one hounding this topic. LMAO

"Vindication!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!"

Yea, right...

Updated On: 8/5/13 at 03:07 PM

[Mikers]

Posted: 8/5/13 at 3:08pm

I did not. I called out the troll for trolling BWW and was fine with leaving it at that. You all ganged up on me for giving my honest opinion.

[dblue236]

Posted: 8/5/13 at 3:09pm

"You all ganged up on me for giving my honest opinion."

Pot, meet kettle.

[Reginald Tresilian]

Posted: 8/5/13 at 3:10pm

You got angry at the OP for having an opinion that differed from yours (though you haven't seen the show yet). You gave your opinion that this makes the OP a troll; everyone who responded seems to have disagreed with that and said so. It's how message boards work.

[Kad]

Posted: 8/5/13 at 3:10pm

You accuse someone of being a troll for posting a less-than-glowing review. It wasnt hateful or even totally negative. Mixed, is what it was.

No one will respect your "honest opinions" if you can't respect anyone elses.


And your opinion is wrong anyway.

[Mikers]

Posted: 8/5/13 at 3:12pm

"You all ganged up on me for giving my honest opinion."

Pot, meet kettle.

--------------------

Am I a gang of one then?

[Mister Matt]

Posted: 8/5/13 at 3:13pm

I called out the troll for trolling BWW and was fine with leaving it at that.

Except you didn't because the person you were attacking wasn't trolling.

You all ganged up on me for giving my honest opinion.

No. People were sick of you attacking someone for absolutely no reason. But then we all found your insane hypocrisy and total lack of self-awareness hilarious.

[dblue236]

Posted: 8/5/13 at 3:14pm

"Am I a gang of one then?"

Oh, I'm pretty sure there's more than one personality in there... but that's beside the point. If you act like a bully, expect people to react.

[dramamama611]

Posted: 8/5/13 at 3:15pm

We 'ganged up' on you, because you attacked a poster that did nothing wrong. (Except not praise your beloved Clay Aiken.)

[artscallion]

Posted: 8/5/13 at 3:16pm

and ironically, that search that Reg recommended led me to a post from you defending the fact that people should be able to post any review as long as they'd seen the show. You went on to affirm that reviews are not only valid if you agree with them.

This is a full on "highly saturated ginger©" alert.

[dblue236]

Posted: 8/5/13 at 3:17pm

"a post from you defending the fact that people should be able to post any review as long as they'd seen the show"

I'm sure next Mikers will try to claim I haven't seen the show. But I'm prepared for that, as I have a photo of my ticket and program that I posted elsewhere for my friends to see. :)

[Mikers]

Posted: 8/5/13 at 3:19pm

and ironically, that search that Reg recommended led me to a post from you defending the fact that people should be able to post any review as long as they'd seen the show. You went on to affirm that reviews are not only valid if you agree with them.
-------------------------------------------------------
I agree with me but it is different if the "review" is only posted to cause an emotional reaction. That is called trolling.

[Kad]

Posted: 8/5/13 at 3:20pm

The only emotional reaction is caused was yours.

[dblue236]

Posted: 8/5/13 at 3:21pm

How was my review posted to cause an emotional reaction? If I had said the performance was perfect, would I have still been a troll because it happened to be my first post? Never mind that it would have been completely dishonest...