Clay Aiken as Joseph — Page 8

#176

Clay Aiken as Joseph

Posted: 8/5/13 at 3:01pm

Because Clay wasn't n it.

---

"TheatreDiva90016 - another good reason to frequent these boards less."<<>> “I hesitate to give this line of discussion the validation it so desperately craves by perpetuating it, but the light from logic is getting further and further away with your every successive post.” <<>> -whatever2

#177

Clay Aiken as Joseph

Posted: 8/5/13 at 3:01pm

Mikers, I think you missed the part of Diva's comment where she said "everything."

That lets me off the hook then thanks.

#178

Clay Aiken as Joseph

Posted: 8/5/13 at 3:02pm

Every day, I find another reason to believe you should have to pass an IQ test to use the internet.

#179

Clay Aiken as Joseph

Posted: 8/5/13 at 3:02pm

Mikers, how come you did not post your review of Matilda ?

I don't post reviews ever. I find them attention seeking.

#180

Clay Aiken as Joseph

Posted: 8/5/13 at 3:02pm

"@Kad. You're the one hounding this topic. LMAO"

Seriously, Kad! Can you not talk about anything other than Clay Aiken???

#181

Clay Aiken as Joseph

Posted: 8/5/13 at 3:03pm

Or maybe because Mikers did not really see Matilda. Because Clay is not in it.

#182

Clay Aiken as Joseph

Posted: 8/5/13 at 3:03pm

If you find reviews attention seeking on a message board about theater, why do you post anything at all? Oh wait... because you're seeking attention.

#183

Clay Aiken as Joseph

Posted: 8/5/13 at 3:03pm

Then why read them?

#184

Clay Aiken as Joseph

Posted: 8/5/13 at 3:04pm

"Then why read them?"

Also that.

#185

Clay Aiken as Joseph

Posted: 8/5/13 at 3:05pm

How did this turn into all about me? Go find someone else to gang up on.

#186

Clay Aiken as Joseph

Posted: 8/5/13 at 3:06pm

YOU made it about you, you deluded dolt.

---

"...everyone finally shut up, and the audience could enjoy the beginning of the Anatevka Pogram in peace."

#187

Clay Aiken as Joseph

Posted: 8/5/13 at 3:07pm

All 6 of you? LMAO!!!!!!!!!!!!
You're harder to get rid of than bedbugs! LMAO
I'd call it well informed. Passionate even LMAO
@Kad. You're the one hounding this topic. LMAO

"Vindication!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!"

Yea, right...

---

"TheatreDiva90016 - another good reason to frequent these boards less."<<>> “I hesitate to give this line of discussion the validation it so desperately craves by perpetuating it, but the light from logic is getting further and further away with your every successive post.” <<>> -whatever2

Updated On: 8/5/13 at 03:07 PM

#188

Clay Aiken as Joseph

Posted: 8/5/13 at 3:08pm

I did not. I called out the troll for trolling BWW and was fine with leaving it at that. You all ganged up on me for giving my honest opinion.

#189

Clay Aiken as Joseph

Posted: 8/5/13 at 3:09pm

"You all ganged up on me for giving my honest opinion."

Pot, meet kettle.

#190

Clay Aiken as Joseph

Posted: 8/5/13 at 3:10pm

You got angry at the OP for having an opinion that differed from yours (though you haven't seen the show yet). You gave your opinion that this makes the OP a troll; everyone who responded seems to have disagreed with that and said so. It's how message boards work.

#191

Clay Aiken as Joseph

Posted: 8/5/13 at 3:10pm

You accuse someone of being a troll for posting a less-than-glowing review. It wasnt hateful or even totally negative. Mixed, is what it was.

No one will respect your "honest opinions" if you can't respect anyone elses.


And your opinion is wrong anyway.

---

"...everyone finally shut up, and the audience could enjoy the beginning of the Anatevka Pogram in peace."

#192

Clay Aiken as Joseph

Posted: 8/5/13 at 3:12pm

"You all ganged up on me for giving my honest opinion."

Pot, meet kettle.

--------------------

Am I a gang of one then?

#193

Clay Aiken as Joseph

Posted: 8/5/13 at 3:13pm

I called out the troll for trolling BWW and was fine with leaving it at that.

Except you didn't because the person you were attacking wasn't trolling.

You all ganged up on me for giving my honest opinion.

No. People were sick of you attacking someone for absolutely no reason. But then we all found your insane hypocrisy and total lack of self-awareness hilarious.

---

"What can you expect from a bunch of seitan worshippers?" - Reginald Tresilian

#194

Clay Aiken as Joseph

Posted: 8/5/13 at 3:14pm

"Am I a gang of one then?"

Oh, I'm pretty sure there's more than one personality in there... but that's beside the point. If you act like a bully, expect people to react.

#195

Clay Aiken as Joseph

Posted: 8/5/13 at 3:15pm

We 'ganged up' on you, because you attacked a poster that did nothing wrong. (Except not praise your beloved Clay Aiken.)

---

If we're not having fun, then why are we doing it? These are DISCUSSION boards, not mutual admiration boards. Discussion only occurs when we are willing to hear what others are thinking, regardless of whether it is alignment to our own thoughts.

#196

Clay Aiken as Joseph

Posted: 8/5/13 at 3:16pm

and ironically, that search that Reg recommended led me to a post from you defending the fact that people should be able to post any review as long as they'd seen the show. You went on to affirm that reviews are not only valid if you agree with them.

This is a full on "highly saturated ginger©" alert.

---

Art has a double face, of expression and illusion.

#197

Clay Aiken as Joseph

Posted: 8/5/13 at 3:17pm

"a post from you defending the fact that people should be able to post any review as long as they'd seen the show"

I'm sure next Mikers will try to claim I haven't seen the show. But I'm prepared for that, as I have a photo of my ticket and program that I posted elsewhere for my friends to see. :)

#198

Clay Aiken as Joseph

Posted: 8/5/13 at 3:19pm

and ironically, that search that Reg recommended led me to a post from you defending the fact that people should be able to post any review as long as they'd seen the show. You went on to affirm that reviews are not only valid if you agree with them.
-------------------------------------------------------
I agree with me but it is different if the "review" is only posted to cause an emotional reaction. That is called trolling.

#199

Clay Aiken as Joseph

Posted: 8/5/13 at 3:20pm

The only emotional reaction is caused was yours.

---

"...everyone finally shut up, and the audience could enjoy the beginning of the Anatevka Pogram in peace."

#200

Clay Aiken as Joseph

Posted: 8/5/13 at 3:21pm

How was my review posted to cause an emotional reaction? If I had said the performance was perfect, would I have still been a troll because it happened to be my first post? Never mind that it would have been completely dishonest...