Jarethan said: "To me, Dancin was a bore in the 70s. I know it was a big hit, but Fosse was hot at the time.
I felt there was a sameness in having one dance number after another, with no connecting thread. I was bored before the 3rd act began. I may be incorrect, but I do remember 2 intermissions. I have to admit that I felt the same way about Jerome Robbin’s Broadway. Too much of a good thing."
I enjoyed the original production of Dancin" for what it was, a collection of dance numbers choreographed by Fosse (who not too long before had Pippin and Chicago on Broadway and the Cabaret film about 5 years earlier), although there were some pointless scenes. To this day, I still can't understand why three performers sat on benches singing "Here You Come Again." Was it to give the dancers a little time to breathe? It was a high energy show, and as I recall, popular with tourists, especially those who may have had difficulty following shows with English dialogue/lyrics. I seem to recall that there was supposed to be a Dancin 2 (Too?), but I don't remember the reason(s) why it never materialized, but I think i t might have had something to do with Fosse's untimely death.
I think the appeal of Jerome Robbins' Broadway. was a bit different as (1) it was presented during a rather sparse Broadway season with very few musicals (I really can't think of what else opened that season) and (2) it recreated iconic scenes from many of Robbins' productions during many years prior that many audience members had never seen. It was sort of a "Come see what you missed all those years ago" type of appeal.
Last season's Dancin' "revival" was a misguided mess that lacked the energy of the original production and IMO seemed like just an effort to benefit from playing off of Fosse's name and work. It was more of a "Come see what you sorta missed that was presented so much better all those years ago" attempt at attracting theater-goers.