Showbiz awards are so subjective, so who ''deserves'' to win is always up for debate. If I were a Tony voter back then, I would've voted for Kelli O'Hara to win for ''Bridges of Madison County'' and the following year for Kristin Chenoweth to win for her tour de force in ''On the 20th Century.''
O'Hara has said that she's grateful she won for ''The King and I,'' but she wishes she really won for ''Bridges,'' which meant more to her. Had O'Hara won for ''Bridges,'' I bet Chenoweth would've won the following year for ''On the 20th Century.'' Instead, O'Hara was seen as overdue to win a Tony, when she won for ''The King and I.'' In that season, it might be remembered that the Drama Desk didn't even nominate O'Hara for ''The King and I,'' and Chenoweth had won both the Outer Critics and Drama Desk prizes for ''On the 20th Century.''
That's the tricky thing about awards. In order to someone to win, it means others must lose. And so much of it is timing, too. If ''Days of Wine and Roses'' were still running at Tony time, O'Hara might've won her 2nd Tony. That role was so much more demanding and stretched her more than Anna in ''The King and I.'' Oh, well. At least she has a Tony.
Which is something her ''Days of Wine and Roses'' co-star Brian d'Arcy James, a 5-time nominee, deserves someday. In my alternate universe, James would've opened as Dan in ''Next to Normal'' on Broadway and won his Tony for THAT show (instead of doing ''Shrek''), and the boys from ''Billy Elliot'' should've never been Tony-eligible as a trio for Best Actor.
Updated On: 7/4/24 at 01:35 AM