Drood is a very solid, big confection of a show. Wisely, it never takes itself too seriously, and is chocked full with great roles. Holmes's score is wonderful.
At the risk of sounding stuck in the past, I almost wish the revival would represent the color and look of the original. The palette of the design was very unique; like an array of ice creams in pastel (with the sugarcoating miraculously kept to a minimum).
Shockingly, the show had eight tony nominations, but was not nominated for scenic design, costumes or lighting. Elements which 26 years later (oh, just shoot me!) remain indelible.
I'm a bit mixed on Edwin Drood - the original cast was ridiculously talented, it was well directed and choreographed, the voting section is controlled pandemonium and as Henrik says, it was beautifully designed, the concept of the whole thing is supremely clever - but for some reason, I found the show resistible back then. It felt like it kept promising more fun than it actually delivered. It's also somewhat disappointing if the murderer you vote for doesn't win (although at the performance I saw, the murderer was Rosa Bud and she has a giddily crazy confession that I remember Patti Cohenour performing to the hilt).
Begin at the beginning and go on till you come to the end: then stop.
I love that they include all the different confessions and "out on a limerick"s on the recording. Rosa Bud's confession is my favorite because of Patti's performance. She really becomes unhinged.
Drood has always struck me as the kind of show who's OBC as stated above, was so filled with top notch talent, that many productions will probably fall short of your expectations.
I am really excited to finally see a Broadway production of this though- I think they have put together a pretty solid cast.
Not that I saw the original production, but the production I did see was probably the most fun I ever had at the theatre. And I was glad when the cast called the audience out on voting for Neville and Helena as the lovers at the end.
When I see the phrase "the ____ estate", I imagine a vast mansion in the country full of monocled men and high-collared women receiving letters about productions across the country and doing spit-takes at whatever they contain.
-Kad
I saw the original cast twice (Stunning) and Patti Cohenour was AMAZING! Once Loretta S*it came in, it really sucked for me... she was gawd awful... And I hate to say it but Donna Murphy was a pretty awful Drood... She did not hit the $ note that Buckley did.
I don't want it to always be Chita either...do you think the audiences will be that biased? Or will have the people who have been watching Smash choose Will Chase? hehe
Which raises a question I never thought of: does anyone know what song the murderer reprises in productions where they don't use "A Man Can Go Quite Mad"?
Even if Chita is voted murderer every night, no one will be disappointed. Her confession is terrific. In my opinion, hers and Rosa's are the best two.
ETA: Tazber, "A Man Could Go Quite Mad" is still used thematically in many of the confessions, even when the song itself is cut at the beginning of the show. The biggest difference in the confessions is that Neville, Helena and Crisparkle's confessions incorporate "A British Subject", the song that replaced "Ceylon". I'm very curious to see which version of the show they're using for the revival, the original version or the revised version that is licensed.
"Art, in itself, is an attempt to bring order out of chaos."-Stephen Sondheim
My only exposure to Rosa Bud's confession (also my favorite) is Patti's recording. And she is tremendous, jumping from screaming to legit soprano in an instant.