Miles2Go2 said: "4. I agree that the video packages seem to be missing something. All the lifetime honorees were very deserving, but the video packages didnt really capture that. They showed highlights from their loves, but didnt chronologically build the story of their lives effectively. Perhaps this was because they rely on the presenters to relay some of this information, but that just isnt as effective in this venue. The presenters should talk about how theyve personally been impacted by the honorees career and then let the video show (not tell) the story. It would all feel more personal that way. Instead, it felt like we just got highlight reels."
I agree with your entire post (and others who made similar comments), especially the part I quoted. I do feel like George Stevens,Jr. was instrumental in ensuring that it was a polished production. Under his influence, the narratives were articulate, cohesive, educational (particularly helpful for honorees less well known, but nonetheless masterful contributors to the arts) and still entertaining. I wasn't all that impressed with Estefan as host. Adam Lambert and Cyndi were terrific; I felt the others were less than stellar. I was so impressed that Phillip Glass was honored - such a powerful, original musical talent.
I've viewed this show annually, and understand that the performers/honoree selected for the concluding acts are given that placement in recognition of their ability to really deliver a tribute. Who can forget Aretha for Carole King...what a seminal performance that was...forever to be remembered.
BTW: I've actually researched obtaining previous Kennedy honors shows and DVDs are available via Ebay. I hope to purchase the entire collection someday.