"If Angela had not won last year her chances would be stronger this year. Barbara Cook has not won since 1957. Katie already has one.
What the three have in common is that they are in crappy productions hoisted by their own talents. Personally I think Katie hammed it up waaaay too much; some underplaying might have made the overall spot more effective. It is a crowdpleaser along the same lines as Marilyn Cooper in WOMAN OF THE YEAR who did win a Tony.
Angela does not need another Tony; Barbara does not need another Tony; Katie does not need another Tony. What they need are JOBS! :) Hollywood doesn't give a damn about the Tonys. If anything let one of these ladies win the silly award and get some better-paying work from it.
And re Lead Actress, Zeta-Jones should win if only because I have no idea who Rene Scott is except that she married a rich husband and sings like all the other gals in their 30s and 40s today: loud and bland. At least Zeta-Jones can act and evoke the emotions within a song."
basically, it reads like they are not winning on merit by the way you put it. i would hope they do. i know there is a lot more involved but if angela is discounted because she may have gotten a "sentimental" tony last year, that is hardly fair. and Barbara has a better chance due to not winning since 1957? that bugs me.
as far as CZJ i hope she is not even nominated. she didn't deserve the oscar either. that came from heavy campaigning by her husband, imo.
i just am not a fan. i thought her acting and dancing was fine though. she is after all a world tap dance champion
"it's a dirty little war"