Just curious what Broadway fans think is the most overrated Tony award winning Broadway musicals. For the fun of it, pick one from every decade since you have been attending Broadway shows. My choices below.
yankeefan7 said: "Just curious what Broadway fans think is the most overrated Tony award winning Broadway musicals. For the fun of it, pick one from every decade since you have been attending Broadway shows.
Easy to do:
1960: THE SOUND OF MUSIC (and FIORELLO!, still waiting for a first-class revival), over GYPSY
1972: TWO GENTLEMEN OF VERONA over FOLLIES
1984: LA CAGE AUX FOLLES over SUNDAY IN THE PARK WITH GEORGE
1991: WILL ROGERS FOLLIES over ONCE ON THIS ISLAND
My pick would be Once. I just didn't know what I was missing after hearing all the hype. I've wondered for a while if it was just too intimate of a show to appreciate from the front row of the Jacobs' rear mezzanine, which is where I sat when I saw it a month after it won the Tony. It didn't engage me at all, and whether that was a result of my seat or the material, I suppose I'll never know.
Lion King. (I didn't go to shows in the 90's, but I did see this one on tour for the first time when I was a kid, so I guess it counts.)
Can't think of anything from the 2000's that I would consider "overrated." If you were to have asked me, say, four years ago or so, I would have said Avenue Q, but now that I'm a little older, I can appreciate Avenue Q more for its mature content and themes, so I can't really say it should've lost the Tony that year anymore.
Once. (While it was good, it felt much more like a play with music than it did a musical.)
"Was uns befreit, das muss stärker sein als wir es sind." -Tanz der Vampire
I'm one of those people that say Caroline Or Change got snubbed for everything. Not saying that Avenue Q is overrated Caroline should have just one Tonys for Score, Book, Musical.
Besides that Cats is an awful musical, but had a bad season. Ragtime should have definitely won over Lion King. Next To Normal over Billy Elliott as well.
There's a difference between "overrated" and "undeserving". For example, I too feel that Follies should have won, but I wouldn't call Two Gentleman of Verona overrated...mostly because nobody talks about it anymore. That being said:
50s: The King and I (most of the songs range from boring to annoying)
60s: Forum (just not my type of humor)
70s: The Wiz (could never get into this score)
80s: La Cage Aux Folles (I understand why it was a big deal at the time, but besides the groundbreaking aspect of the original production the show itself is just fine)
90s: City of Angels (brilliant orchestrations masking a decent-but-not-outstanding score)
00s: Spamalot (the worst nominee that year)
10s: Memphis (one of the worst shows I've ever seen)
CATS!!! There were other years I may preferred a different show than actually one - Newsies over Once, Light in the Piazza over Spamalot, Ragtime over Lion King, etc. But Cats is in a single awful league of it's own so I can't compare anything else in the same way.
The thing is, besides being an utter toad of a human being, Riedel usually has the least knowledge of the topic in the room. He doesn't usually understand the content or approach of a show, and is always completely and unfailingly socially ignorant, which makes it really infuriating when Susan can't get a word in edgewise. A definitive mansplainer; it's always painful when he has female guests. I watch the show sporadically when I really want to see a guest, because it's the only theatre talkshow we have, but it would be so much better without this hateful clown in a dadcoat. (thanks ScaryWarhol)
Dreamgirls was my first Broadway show so I naturally have a soft spot for it, but I also saw Nine and I love all things Italian - - - and Fellini is one of my favorite directors so I was really torn when Nine won over Dreamgirls.