How can you try to even make any comparison between a dance revue (with no plot) over a book musical? You just can't... and I won't.
Though I've been a huge enormous fan of Bob Fosse's work since childhood (mom was a former Fosse dancer -- circa 1964-74), I wasn't all too pleased with FOSSE. No narrative, no costumes, no Gwen Verdon numbers, it goes on. Being friends with numerous cast members who were with the show since conception, I wasn't alone on my assessment of the show. Every single one of the original cast had quite a bit of a beef about the show and what really could have been. An enormous amount of material was considered, but eventually not used. Most feel these were better than what Broadway audiences saw. I still think a JEROME ROBBINS' BROADWAY-type show would have been a dream, with full recreations of each show's original costume, set and lighting design and WITH a narrator prepping the dance number about to take place, etc. Audiences at FOSSE who weren't familiar with Bob Fosse's work had NO idea what year or from what show the number they were watching on stage came from. Yes, it was listed in the Playbill, but most read it after the fact, and not remembering the dance, etc. At least in the subpar abridged DVD incarnation of the show (featuring the final Broadway cast), they included onscreen captions stating what show the number you were watching came from, etc.
Oh, the show that COULD have been.