Posted: 5/14/17 at 2:04pm
Nancy just posted on Facebook that she's performing in place of Glenn today! Man, I wish I didn't have plans already and could go!
Updated On: 5/14/17 at 02:04 PM
Posted: 5/14/17 at 2:47pm
This is the only thing that could have gotten me back to this show. So bummed there wasn't more notice.
Posted: 5/14/17 at 2:57pm
Ms Close didn't manage the whole London run either. It seems only fair Ms Anderson is granted the courtesy of doing the job she was prepared for.
Posted: 5/14/17 at 3:14pm
"Ms Close didn't manage the whole London run either. It seems only fair Ms Anderson is granted the courtesy of doing the job she was prepared for."
Glenn is allowed to take a performance off, seems like she was sick as it is. And no, an understudy is not owed any courtesy pity performance. It is hardly fair or unfair.
Posted: 5/14/17 at 3:23pm
can anyone grab me an extra playbill with her insert in it? thanks. i will pay for shipping.
Posted: 5/14/17 at 4:15pm
Looks like this was a last minute decision by Close, otherwise I think they would have cancelled.
Posted: 5/15/17 at 5:36am
Glenn is allowed to take a performance off, seems like she was sick as it is. And no, an understudy is not owed any courtesy pity performance. It is hardly fair or unfair.
Nobody said she was owed anything so get off your high horse. Perhaps "logical" is a more precise word than "fair" but the point is, they clearly cast an understudy for a reason. The producers clearly decided Ms Anderson was good enough to play the role. She why not seize the opportunity to see a different performance? As London demonstrated, most audience members adored the understudy- some even preferred her.
No need to be such a tight-arse!
Updated On: 5/15/17 at 05:36 AM
Posted: 5/15/17 at 6:27am
devonian.t said: "Glenn is allowed to take a performance off, seems like she was sick as it is. And no, an understudy is not owed any courtesy pity performance. It is hardly fair or unfair.
Nobody said she was owed anything so get off your high horse. Perhaps "logical" is a more precise word than "fair" but the point is, they clearly cast an understudy for a reason. The producers clearly decided Ms Anderson was good enough to play the role. She why not seize the opportunity to see a different performance? As London demonstrated, most audience members adored the understudy- some even preferred her.
No need to be such a tight-arse!
"
To be fair you sounded like a "tight-arse" yourself in your original post.
Posted: 5/15/17 at 1:27pm
Any reports? I'm sure she did just fine. How many audience members stayed, and were they supportive?
Posted: 5/15/17 at 1:34pm
Posted: 5/15/17 at 1:35pm
Posted: 5/15/17 at 2:37pm
The Distinctive Baritone said: "Any reports? I'm sure she did just fine. How many audience members stayed, and were they supportive?
I shared my experience on the original thread. Page 45.
"
Posted: 5/15/17 at 2:46pm
...and so glad that photo exists...^^^
Updated On: 5/16/17 at 02:46 PM
Posted: 5/15/17 at 3:30pm
It would be nice to see a Norma who can sing the score as written.
... Even if it's an understudy.
Posted: 5/16/17 at 12:39pm
Another great image I found...
