Posted: 1/31/15 at 7:13pm
This is NOT intended as a put down of the original. I've seen photos and clips and it looks gorgeous!
Posted: 1/31/15 at 7:14pm
Updated On: 1/31/15 at 07:14 PM
Posted: 1/31/15 at 7:16pm
However I totally agree with you about the score. I didn't think it was very good when I first listened to it, but I revisited it a few years later and found it to be quite brilliant and nuanced.
EDIT: Haha, looks like Nowack and I are on pretty much the same page
Updated On: 1/31/15 at 07:16 PM
Posted: 1/31/15 at 7:29pm
Posted: 1/31/15 at 8:30pm
Also saw the OB production and the Roundabout production. Never the same as the first time but did appreciate both productions.
Posted: 1/31/15 at 8:47pm
It is weird. And beautiful and daring.
As someone mentioned the original Broadway production is on youtube.
Chrysanthemum Tea is one of those really great songs that isn't widely covered and generally not discussed, but it is a gem in a score of riches.
Updated On: 1/31/15 at 08:47 PM
Posted: 1/31/15 at 9:30pm
Posted: 1/31/15 at 10:07pm
Someone in a Tree was particularly irritating as an example of endless, repetitive self-indulgence.
The rest of the score was wan, pallid, enervated and enervating.
The design was the only good thing about it.
Posted: 1/31/15 at 10:09pm
Anyway, I haven't seen it...I have not really had the interest to...maybe I should check it out!
Posted: 1/31/15 at 10:16pm
Posted: 1/31/15 at 10:31pm
The design of the OBC is pretty much phenomenal, and the sets and costumes are wonderful.
I love both productions Broadway productions, and many peoples opinions differ on which one they prefer, I personally prefer the OBC as I think that is greatly put on. The Roundabout one, from clips I've seen, didn't look too bad. But the orchestrations are sadly minimised for the Revival.
The book drags a bit, but the score and the acting of the OBC make up for it.
Posted: 1/31/15 at 10:45pm
Anyways, the score is ravishing. Sondheim is incredible at making his scores transport you to another place and time. "Please Hello" is pure magic, as is the thrilling staging of "A Bowler Hat". And if you've heard the original "Chrysanthemum Tea", you understand just how brilliant the final version is.
This brings me to one of the things I find most interesting in theatre. Clive Barnes was a reviewer at The New York Times during the runs of "Company", 'Follies", "A Little Night Music", and "Pacific Overtures". His review for "Company" was actually very good for saying he didn't like it. He repeatedly said how much he thought others would love it and how it deserved to win the Tony Award for best musical. His "Follies" review is much more critical, dispite him saying that he liked it more than "Company. However, "A Little Night Music" received a rave. Clive had said that he believed Sondheim was the best Lyricist in theatre, but "Night Music" made him up it to best composer. He raved over the "orgy of waltzes" and the class and sophistication of the operetta. Then, his review for "Pacific Overtures" came out. I personally find "Pacific Overtures" a much harder work to get into than "Company" and "Follies" - and even my close friends who adore Sondheim, do not appreciate the show. Clive Barnes, however, found it extraordinarily ambitious and gave it a very good review - he felt the score was fantastic, but believed the book to be lackluster and the ending to be from another show. This is interesting in that it seems his love of "Night Music" opened his mind to Sondheim's other shows, and allowed him to fully appreciate them. Would you expect someone how rather disliked "Company" and "Follies" to proclaim "Passion" as "Just plain wonderful. This is the most thrilling piece of theatre on Broadway."? That's what I adore about Sondheim - he writes such different pieces that allow different people to discover his works. It's amazing that this man composed "Company", "Sunday In the Park With George", Into the Woods", and "Passion", when they each seem like pieces different teams would adapt.
Posted: 1/31/15 at 10:58pm
I guess I'm not a Sondheim fan, but I like some of his work. You have to give me credit for familiarizing myself with his work instead of refusing to just because I don't like some of his work.
Sorry, this isn't really the thread for this comment, but I wanted to get my thoughts down.
Updated On: 1/31/15 at 10:58 PM
Posted: 2/1/15 at 2:20am
Did any of the original cast go on to have enduring careers in the theatre?
Posted: 2/1/15 at 7:15am
Except it wasn't a hit.
I guess there just weren't enough snobs to make it a hit, or enough to make a snob musical a hit. There were certainly enough snobs to have made many a snob play a hit down through the years -- to the misfortune and misery of the rest of us! Maybe a musical has insufficient snob cachet for snobs. Though there seemed to be more than enough of it in Sunday in the Park With George!
To all of those who missed the original production of Pacific Overtures: : You should have seen the deadened expressions of the people staggering out of the theatre after it ended. It looked as if they had just finished a ten hour trek across the steppes of Siberia.
Posted: 2/1/15 at 7:30am
"Complex lyrics"
Ha, ha, ha. We now can add two more words to the list of coded theatre terms.
Minimalist=. Minimal pleasure!
Complex= Strained, self-indulgent, and self-congratulatory.
And yet two more! This thread alone could provide enough of them to fill an entire dictionary!
"odd, daring."
Odd= Audience, beware. You are in for it.
Daring= Audience, double beware. You are REALLY in for it!
Updated On: 2/1/15 at 07:30 AM
Posted: 2/1/15 at 8:11am
Updated On: 2/1/15 at 08:11 AM
Posted: 2/1/15 at 12:58pm
Amazing score, anyhow. Someone in a Tree is the obvious classic (I'd love to hear it live someday with a nice big orchestra) but the dark comedy numbers are just killer.
Posted: 2/1/15 at 2:12pm
Posted: 2/1/15 at 2:16pm
Posted: 2/1/15 at 5:24pm
Broadway audiences of all eras reject bad shows.
Isn't it funny how in all these threads about these megabomb bores, the voices of the vast general public --- save with perhaps one exception --- are never heard?
The unknowing would think that these were all masterpieces from start to finish, and that everyone in the audience was enraptured by every word and note.
If only they knew!
Updated On: 2/1/15 at 05:24 PM
Posted: 2/1/15 at 5:34pm
Your dramatic reiterations of the multitudes staggering aghast out of Sondheim shows never fail to amuse me.
Posted: 2/1/15 at 5:55pm
You'd never know that here.
"Your dramatic reiterations of the multitudes staggering aghast out of Sondheim shows never fail to amuse me."
The audiences didn't seem similarly amused.
Updated On: 2/1/15 at 05:55 PM
BroadwayWorld TV